Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Design and performance of a DNP prepolarizer coupled to a rodent MRI scanner

Open access
Comment, A., van den Brandt, B., Uffmann, K., Kurdzesau, F., Jannin, S., Konter, J.A., Hautle, P., Wenckebach, W.Th., Gruetter, R., van der Klink, J.J.·2007·Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering

Abstract

For most of the last forty years, the techniques of Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (DNP) have been confined to particle‐physics laboratories building polarized targets, but recently it has been shown that samples similar to a solid target can be transformed into room temperature liquid solutions while retaining a high nuclear polarization. This method of “hyperpolarization” is of interest in NMR/MRI/MRS. We describe a 3.35 T DNP/9.4 T MRI installation based on a continuous‐flow cryostat, using a standard wide‐bore low‐field NMR magnet as prepolarizer magnet and a widely available radical as polarizing agent. The interfacing to a rodent scanner requires that the infusion of the polarized solution in the animal be remotely controlled, because of limited access inside the magnet bore. Physiological constraints on the infusion rate can be a serious source of polarization loss, and the discussion of efficiency is therefore limited to that of the prepolarizer itself, i.e., the spin temperatures obtained in the solid state. To put our results in context, we summarize data obtained in targets with different types of radicals, and provide a short review of the DNP mechanisms needed in their discussion. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Concepts Magn Reson Part B (Magn Reson Engineering) 31B: 255–269, 2007

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cmr.b.20099

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Comment, A., van den Brandt, B., Uffmann, K., Kurdzesau, F., Jannin, S., Konter, J. A., Hautle, P., Wenckebach, W. T., Gruetter, R., & van der Klink, J. J.
Venue
Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10
Volume
31B
Issue
4
Pages
255-269
ISSN
  • 1552-5031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-504X
OpenAlex
W2162480236
Cited by
189
References
0
FWCI
3.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design and performance of a DNP prepolarizer coupled to a rodent MRI scanner. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cmr.b.20099
The paper
Comment, A., van den Brandt, B., Uffmann, K., Kurdzesau, F., Jannin, S., Konter, J. A., Hautle, P., Wenckebach, W. T., Gruetter, R., & van der Klink, J. J. (2007). Design and performance of a DNP prepolarizer coupled to a rodent MRI scanner. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/cmr.b.20099

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.