Cited by 116Pain Management and Opioid UseIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

The panorama of opioid‐related cognitive dysfunction in patients with cancer: A critical literature appraisal

Open access
Lawlor, Peter G.·2002·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Opioids have an essential role in the management of pain in cancer patients, particularly those with advanced disease. Cognitive dysfunction is a recognized complication of opioid use. However, misconceptions and controversy surround the nature and prevalence of its occurrence. A projected increase in the aging cancer population highlights the need for a better understanding of this phenomenon. METHODS: A critical appraisal of the literature evidence in relation to the pattern, pathophysiology, assessment, impact, and management of cognitive dysfunction due to opioid use in cancer pain management is given. RESULTS: Studies in cancer patients with less advanced disease reveal subtle evidence of cognitive impairment, largely related to initial dosing or dose increases. In advanced cancer, opioid‐induced cognitive dysfunction usually occurs in the form of delirium, a multifactorial syndrome. The presence of both cognitive impairment and delirium frequently is misdiagnosed or missed. Potential risk factors include neuropathic and incidental pain, opioid tolerance, somatization of psychologic distress, and a history of drug or alcohol abuse. Elevation of opioid metabolites with renal impairment may contribute to cognitive dysfunction. Recognition of opioid‐related cognitive dysfunction is improved by objective screening. Successful management requires either dose reduction or a change of opioid, in addition to addressing other reversible precipitants such as dehydration or volume depletion. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid‐related cognitive dysfunction tends to be subtle in the earlier stages of cancer, whereas delirium, a more florid form with behavioral disturbance is likely to be present in the advanced cancer population. In patients with advanced disease, an optimal management approach requires careful clinical assessment, identification of risk factors, objective monitoring of cognition, maintenance of adequate hydration, and either dose reduction or switching to a different opioid. Cancer 2002;94:1836–53. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10389

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.10389

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lawlor, P. G.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Lawlor, Peter G.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-03-15
Volume
94
Issue
6
Pages
1836-1853
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1595658543
Cited by
116
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
delirium, cancer pain management, opioid analgesia, advanced cancer, opioid tolerance, neuropathic pain, opioid metabolites, renal dysfunction, cognitive screening, dehydration, opioid dose reduction, opioid switching, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Narcotics, Neoplasms, Pain, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Prevalence, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review