The panorama of opioid‐related cognitive dysfunction in patients with cancer: A critical literature appraisal
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Opioids have an essential role in the management of pain in cancer patients, particularly those with advanced disease. Cognitive dysfunction is a recognized complication of opioid use. However, misconceptions and controversy surround the nature and prevalence of its occurrence. A projected increase in the aging cancer population highlights the need for a better understanding of this phenomenon. METHODS: A critical appraisal of the literature evidence in relation to the pattern, pathophysiology, assessment, impact, and management of cognitive dysfunction due to opioid use in cancer pain management is given. RESULTS: Studies in cancer patients with less advanced disease reveal subtle evidence of cognitive impairment, largely related to initial dosing or dose increases. In advanced cancer, opioid‐induced cognitive dysfunction usually occurs in the form of delirium, a multifactorial syndrome. The presence of both cognitive impairment and delirium frequently is misdiagnosed or missed. Potential risk factors include neuropathic and incidental pain, opioid tolerance, somatization of psychologic distress, and a history of drug or alcohol abuse. Elevation of opioid metabolites with renal impairment may contribute to cognitive dysfunction. Recognition of opioid‐related cognitive dysfunction is improved by objective screening. Successful management requires either dose reduction or a change of opioid, in addition to addressing other reversible precipitants such as dehydration or volume depletion. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid‐related cognitive dysfunction tends to be subtle in the earlier stages of cancer, whereas delirium, a more florid form with behavioral disturbance is likely to be present in the advanced cancer population. In patients with advanced disease, an optimal management approach requires careful clinical assessment, identification of risk factors, objective monitoring of cognition, maintenance of adequate hydration, and either dose reduction or switching to a different opioid. Cancer 2002;94:1836–53. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10389
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among individuals receiving opioid treatment for pain management in cancer, opioid use is associated with reduced performance on measures of reaction time, attention, and episodic memory, related to initial dosing or dose increases.
“Among individuals receiving opioid treatment for pain management in cancer, opioid use has also been associated with reduced performance on measures of reaction time, attention, and episodic memory, related to initial dosing or dose increases (Kurita et al., 2009;Lawlor, 2002).”
From A review of the relation between dissociation, memory, executive functioning and social cognition in military members and civilians with neuropsychiatric conditions (2016) · cites this paper as Lawlor, 2002
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The effect of pain on cognitive function: A review of clinical and preclinical research
Moriarty, O., McGuire, B. E., & Finn, D. P. (2011) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.01.002 · Cited by 1,122 · see citing works
McKinnon, M. C., Boyd, J. E., Frewen, P. A., Lanius, U. F., Jetly, R., Richardson, J. D., & Lanius, R. A. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.017 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“Among individuals receiving opioid treatment for pain management in cancer, opioid use has also been associated with reduced performance on measures of reaction time, attention, and episodic memory, related to initial dosing or dose increases (Kurita et al., 2009; Lawlor, 2002).”
- Authors
- Lawlor, P. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lawlor, Peter G.
- ORCID
- Lawlor, Peter G.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03-15
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1836-1853
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1595658543
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Keywords
- delirium, cancer pain management, opioid analgesia, advanced cancer, opioid tolerance, neuropathic pain, opioid metabolites, renal dysfunction, cognitive screening, dehydration, opioid dose reduction, opioid switching, risk factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Narcotics, Neoplasms, Pain, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Prevalence, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review