The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changing patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Quality‐of‐life (QoL) issues have become increasingly important as the number of newly diagnosed patients with cancer increases and survival improves. In 1983, Coates et al. reported a survey of patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy and showed the importance of including patient feedback for the accurate assessment of QoL (Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1983;19:203–208.). The authors carried out a similar survey in 100 patients with cancer with the objectives of 1) investigating the changes in patient perceptions that have occurred and 2) evaluating the impact of new treatments on the profile of chemotherapy side effects among patients receiving anticancer drugs. METHODS: One hundred patients attending the outpatient Medical Oncology Department of the Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital Group were surveyed between August 1998 and February 2000 by trained interviewers who were blinded to the patients' treatment. Patients identified all side effects associated with their treatment using a set of 45 cards that named physical side effects (Group A) and a set of 27 cards that named nonphysical side effects (Group B), and the patients ranked these side effects according to severity. The top 5 cards from each group were then combined, and the resulting 10 cards were rated again by severity, regardless of group. Results were analyzed for the entire cohort and for demographic, social, and clinical subgroups. RESULTS: The participants included 65 women and 35 men; the most common malignancies were breast carcinoma (40 patients), gastrointestinal carcinoma (19 patients), lung carcinoma (7 patients), and ovarian carcinoma (9 patients). Patients rated affects my family or partner as the most severe side effect, alopecia was second, and fatigue was the third most severe. Effects on work or home responsibilities, effects on social activities, and loss of interest in sex were ranked fourth, fifth, and sixth, respectively. The results contrasted with those of Coates et al., in which affects my family or partner was ranked 10th, and fatigue was ranked 8th. CONCLUSIONS: Patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy have changed markedly. In the current study, fatigue and psychosocial QoL concerns predominated, compared with emesis, nausea, and negative reactions to the treatment visit in the original survey. The current findings are consistent with the progress that has been made in reducing certain chemotherapy‐associated toxicities. Fatigue, however, although it often is related to anemia and is treatable with recombinant human erythropoietin, remains a major concern. The emotional, social, and sexual consequences of cancer treatment present continuing challenges in efforts to optimize QoL and to develop effective supportive care. Cancer 2002;95:155–63. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10630
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2003
Ries, L. A. G., Harkins, D., Krapcho, M. F., Mariotto, A. B., Miller, B., Feuer, E. J., Clegg, L. X., Eisner, M. P., Horner, M., Howlader, N., et al. (2006) · Digital Archive @ GSU · Cited by 11,403
Impact of Cancer-Related Fatigue on the Lives of Patients: New Findings From the Fatigue Coalition
Curt, G. A., Breitbart, W., Cella, D., Groopman, J. E., Horning, S. J., Itri, L. M., Johnson, D. H., Miaskowski, C., Scherr, S. L., Portenoy, R. K., et al. (2000) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.5-5-353 · Cited by 1,248
On the receiving end—patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy
Coates, A., Abraham, S., Kaye, S. B., Sowerbutts, T., Frewin, C., Fox, R. M., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (1983) · European Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1016/0277-5379(83)90418-2 · Cited by 997
Littlewood, T. J., Bajetta, E., Nortier, J. W. R., Vercammen, E., Rapoport, B., & for the Epoetin Alfa Study Group (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2865 · Cited by 974
(1997) · PubMed · Cited by 762
Demetri, G. D., Kris, M., Wade, J., Degos, L., & Cella, D. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1998.16.10.3412 · Cited by 751
Glaspy, J., Bukowski, R., Steinberg, D., Taylor, C., Tchekmedyian, S., & Vadhan-Raj, S. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.1218 · Cited by 693
Cella, D. F. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 687
Cella, D., Davis, K., Breitbart, W., Curt, G., & Coalition, F. T. F. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.14.3385 · Cited by 652
Gabrilove, J. L., Cleeland, C. S., Livingston, R. B., Sarokhan, B., Winer, E., & Einhorn, L. H. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2875 · Cited by 595
Cited by
Recent progress in tumor pH targeting nanotechnology
Lee, E. S., Gao, Z., & Bae, Y. H. (2008) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.05.003 · Cited by 866
A Brief Intervention for Fatigue Management in Breast Cancer Survivors
Fillion, L., Gagnon, P., Leblond, F., Gélinas, C., Savard, J., Dupuis, R., Duval, K., & Larochelle, M. (2008) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/01.ncc.0000305698.97625.95 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Carelle, N., Piotto, E., Bellanger, A., Germanaud, J., Thuillier, A., & Khayat, D.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-06-28
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 155-163
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2016963791
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changing patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.10630
- The paper
- Carelle, N., Piotto, E., Bellanger, A., Germanaud, J., Thuillier, A., & Khayat, D. (2002). Changing patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10630
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.