Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 336

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk factors for local recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma tumors after a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation

Komorizono, Yasuji, Oketani, Makoto, Sako, Katsumi, Yamasaki, Naruhiro, Shibatou, Toshihiko, Maeda, Masahiko, Kohara, Kazunori, Shigenobu, Shuhou, Ishibashi, Kazuaki, Arima, Terukatsu·2003·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to clarify risk factors for local tumor recurrence and to determine which patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are most suitable for a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation. METHODS: Fifty‐six consecutive patients with 65 HCC tumors measuring ≤ 3 cm in greatest dimension who received a single session, single application of percutaneous RF ablation and who achieved optimal tumor ablation, as assessed by an immediate computed tomography scan, were enrolled in this study. Six possible factors for local recurrence were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards regression model: tumor size, tumor location, proximity of the tumor to intrahepatic large vessels, types of electrodes used, prior treatment, and observation of impedance rises. Local recurrence free intervals were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between groups were compared using the log‐rank test. RESULTS: The Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall cumulative local recurrence free intervals after a single RF ablation treatment were 76% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 70.9–81.7%) at 12 months and 74% (95%CI, 68.2–79.6%) at 15 months. The log‐rank test revealed a statistically significant difference between the local recurrence free intervals according to tumor size (P = 0.001) and tumor location (P < 0.001). Further investigation with a Cox regression analysis indicated that a greatest tumor dimension > 2 cm (risk ratio [RR], 4.9; 95%CI, 1.3–16.4; P = 0.019) and subcapsular location (RR, 5.2; 95%CI, 1.7–16.6; P = 0.005) were associated independently with local recurrence. The other four factors were not associated with local recurrence in this study. CONCLUSIONS: A single session, single application of RF ablation produced favorable local control. Patients who have nonsubcapsular HCC tumors measuring ≤ 2 cm in greatest dimension may be the most suitable candidates for a single‐session, single application of RF ablation. Cancer 2003;97:1253–62. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11168

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.11168

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 336

Metadata

Authors
Komorizono, Y., Oketani, M., Sako, K., Yamasaki, N., Shibatou, T., Maeda, M., Kohara, K., Shigenobu, S., Ishibashi, K., & Arima, T.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02-20
Volume
97
Issue
5
Pages
1253-1262
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1984471249
Cited by
336
References
1
FWCI
8.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors for local recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma tumors after a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.11168
The paper
Komorizono, Y., Oketani, M., Sako, K., Yamasaki, N., Shibatou, T., Maeda, M., Kohara, K., Shigenobu, S., Ishibashi, K., & Arima, T. (2003). Risk factors for local recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma tumors after a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11168

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.