The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Women with breast carcinoma commonly experience psychologic distress following their diagnosis. Women who participate in breast cancer support groups have reported significant reduction in their psychologic distress and pain and improvement in the quality of their lives. Web‐based breast cancer social support groups are widely used, but little is known of their effectiveness. Preliminary evidence suggests that women benefit from their participation in web‐based support groups. METHODS: Seventy‐two women with primary breast carcinoma were assigned randomly to a 12‐week, web‐based, social support group (Bosom Buddies). The group was semistructured, moderated by a health care professional, and delivered in an asynchronous newsgroup format. RESULTS: The results indicate that a web‐based support group can be useful in reducing depression and cancer‐related trauma, as well as perceived stress, among women with primary breast carcinoma. The effect sizes ranged from 0.38 to 0.54. Participants perceived a variety of benefits and high satisfaction from their participation in the intervention CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the web‐based program, Bosom Buddies, was effective in reducing participants' scores on depression, perceived stress, and cancer‐related trauma measures. The effect size of the intervention was in the moderate range. Although web‐based social support groups offer many advantages, this delivery mechanism presents a number of ethical issues that need to be addressed. Cancer 2003;97:1164–73. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11174
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In general, ISGs that are moderated by a clinician tend to show benefits (31).”
From Behavioral Intervention Technologies: Evidence review and recommendations for future research in mental health (2013) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
A Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
Fawzy, F. I. (1993) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820210015002 · Cited by 1,030
Group Support for Patients With Metastatic Cancer: A Randomized Prospective Outcome Study
Spiegel, D. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780300039004 · Cited by 862
Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients
Hann, D., Winter, K., & Jacobsen, P. (1999) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(99)00004-5 · Cited by 822
Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups.
Davison, K. P., Pennebaker, J. W., & Dickerson, S. S. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.2.205 · Cited by 720
Can 40 Seconds of Compassion Reduce Patient Anxiety?
Fogarty, L., Curbow, B. A., Wingard, J. R., McDonnell, K. A., & Somerfield, M. R. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.1.371 · Cited by 545
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016007435.x · DOI · Paper page
- King SA, 1994, Analysis of electronic support groups for recovering addicts, Interpers Comput Technol Electron J 21st Century., 2, 47
- Mickelson KD, 1997, Culture of the internet, 157
- Classen C, 1993, Brief supportive‐expressive group therapy for women with primary breast cancer: ATX manual
- Kreshka MA, 1997, One in eight: women speaking to women, a breast cancer workbook‐journal
- KoopmanC AngellK KreshkaMA et al.Workbook‐journal significantly reduces posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms among rural women with primary breast cancer. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Psychological Society Adelaide Australia September 22–24 2001.
- Weathers FW, 1991, PCL‐C for DSM‐IV
- Watson M, 1989, Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) scale: users' manual
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Griffiths, F., Lindenmeyer, A., Powell, J., Lowe, P., & Thorogood, M. (2006) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.8.2.e10 · Cited by 820
“Supplier control of intervention Message board with weekly discussion topic Support group for women with breast cancer: Web-based social support group moderated by mental health professional Breast cancer United States Winzel- 2003 [ 68 ] berg”
BackgroundThe Delivery of Public Health Interventions via the Internet: Actualizing Their Potential
Bennett, G. G., & Glasgow, R. E. (2009) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235 · Cited by 800
Mohr, D. C., Burns, M. N., Schueller, S. M., Clarke, G., & Klinkman, M. (2013) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.03.008 · Cited by 693
“In general, ISGs that are moderated by a clinician tend to show benefits [31].”
Rice, R. E. (2005) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.032 · Cited by 721
The impact of the internet on cancer outcomes.
Eysenbach, G. (2003) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.53.6.356 · Cited by 573
Metadata
- Authors
- Winzelberg, A. J., Classen, C., Alpers, G. W., Roberts, H., Koopman, C., Adams, R. E., Ernst, H., Dev, P., & Taylor, C. B.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Winzelberg, Andrew J.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02-20
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1164-1173
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2035352836
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 8.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MADOC (University of Mannheim) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- breast cancer, online social support, psychological distress, depression, perceived stress, newsgroups, quality of life, patient satisfaction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Depression, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Self-Help Groups, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Patient Satisfaction, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
