Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 454

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Survival rates in patients with low‐grade glioma after intraoperative magnetic resonance image guidance

Claus, Elizabeth B., Horlacher, Andres, Hsu, Liangge, Schwartz, Richard B., Dello‐Iacono, Donna, Talos, Florian, Jolesz, Ferenc A., Black, Peter M.·2005·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No age‐adjusted or histologic‐adjusted assessments of the association between extent of resection and risk of either recurrence or death exist for neurosurgical patients who undergo resection of low‐grade glioma using intraoperative magnetic resonance image (MRI) guidance. METHODS: The current data included 156 patients who underwent surgical resection of a unifocal, supratentorial, low‐grade glioma in the MRI suite at Brigham and Women's Hospital between January 1, 1997, and January 31, 2003. Estimates of disease‐free and overall survival probabilities were calculated using Kaplan–Meier methodology. The association between extent of resection and these probabilities was measured using a Cox proportional hazards model. Observed death rates were compared with the expected death rate using age‐specific and histologic‐specific survival rates obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry. RESULTS: Patients who underwent subtotal resection were at 1.4 times the risk of disease recurrence (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.7–3.1) and at 4.9 times the risk of death (95% CI, 0.61–40.0) relative to patients who underwent gross total resection. The 1‐year, 2‐year, and 5‐year age‐adjusted and histologic‐adjusted death rates for patients who underwent surgical resection using intraoperative MRI guidance were 1.9% (95% CI, 0.3–4.2%), 3.6% (95% CI, 0.4–6.7%), and 17.6% (95% CI, 5.9–29.3%), respectively: significantly lower than the rates reported using national data bases. CONCLUSIONS: The data from the current study suggested a possible association between surgical resection and survival for neurosurgical patients who underwent surgery for low‐grade glioma under intraoperative MRI guidance. Further study within the context of a large, prospective, population‐based project will be needed to confirm these findings. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.20867

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 454

Metadata

Authors
Claus, E. B., Horlacher, A., Hsu, L., Schwartz, R. B., Dello‐Iacono, D., Talos, F., Jolesz, F. A., & Black, P. M.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02-02
Volume
103
Issue
6
Pages
1227-1233
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2028653658
Cited by
454
References
23
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival rates in patients with low‐grade glioma after intraoperative magnetic resonance image guidance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.20867
The paper
Claus, E. B., Horlacher, A., Hsu, L., Schwartz, R. B., Dello‐Iacono, D., Talos, F., Jolesz, F. A., & Black, P. M. (2005). Survival rates in patients with low‐grade glioma after intraoperative magnetic resonance image guidance. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20867

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.