The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of 1000 cases
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was introduced recently as a therapeutic modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), an alternative to percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT), which is coming into use worldwide. Previously reported treatment efficacy and complication rates have varied considerably. METHODS: Between February 1999 and February 2003, the authors performed 1000 treatments of RFA to 2140 HCC nodules in 664 patients with a cooled‐tip electrode at the University of Tokyo Hospital (Tokyo, Japan). Short‐term and long‐term complications were analyzed by treatment and session basis. Cumulative survival was also assessed in 319 patients who received RFA as primary treatment (naive patients) and 345 patients who received RFA for recurrent tumor after previous treatment including resection, PEIT, microwave coagulation therapy, and transarterial embolization (nonnaive patients). RESULTS: A total of 40 major complications (4.0% per treatment, 1.9% per session) and 17 minor complications (1.7% per treatment, 0.82% per session) were observed during the observation period until March 31, 2004. There were no treatment‐related deaths. Surgical intervention was required in one case each of bile peritonitis and duodenal perforation. The cumulative survival rates at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 94.7%, 86.1%, 77.7%, 67.4%, and 54.3% for naive patients, whereas the cumulative survival rates were 91.8%, 75.6%, 62.4%, 53.7%, and 38.2% for nonnaive patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The authors confirmed the safety and efficacy of RFA for HCC in a large‐scale series and long‐term prognosis was satisfactory. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 10-Year Outcome and Prognostic Factors
Shiina, S., Tateishi, R., Arano, T., Uchino, K., Enooku, K., Nakagawa, H., Asaoka, Y., Sato, T., Masuzaki, R., Kondo, Y., et al. (2012) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.425 · Cited by 724
Self-citationHepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: Clinical features and prognostic factors
Uchino, K., Tateishi, R., Shiina, S., Kanda, M., Masuzaki, R., Kondo, Y., Goto, T., Omata, M., Yoshida, H., & Koike, K. (2011) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.25960 · Cited by 427
Self-citationHiraoka, A., Michitaka, K., Kumada, T., Izumi, N., Kadoya, M., Kokudo, N., Kubo, S., Matsuyama, Y., Nakashima, O., Sakamoto, M., et al. (2017) · Liver Cancer · doi:10.1159/000479984 · Cited by 331
Choi, D., Lim, H. K., Rhim, H., Kim, Y.-S., Lee, W. J., Paik, S. W., Koh, K. C., Lee, J. H., Choi, M. S., & Yoo, B. C. (2007) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0461-5 · Cited by 324
Yoo, T. G., Cranshaw, I., Broom, R., Pandanaboyana, S., & Bartlett, A. (2017) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2017.02.003 · Cited by 44
“Thermal ablation is a safe procedure with low complication rates [58,59].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Tateishi, R., Shiina, S., Teratani, T., Obi, S., Sato, S., Koike, Y., Fujishima, T., Yoshida, H., Kawabe, T., & Omata, M.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-02
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1201-1209
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1563869372
- Cited by
- 778
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of 1000 cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.20892
- The paper
- Tateishi, R., Shiina, S., Teratani, T., Obi, S., Sato, S., Koike, Y., Fujishima, T., Yoshida, H., Kawabe, T., & Omata, M. (2005). Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of 1000 cases. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20892
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.