Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 778

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of 1000 cases

Open access
Tateishi, Ryosuke, Shiina, Shuichiro, Teratani, Takuma, Obi, Shuntaro, Sato, Shinpei, Koike, Yukihiro, Fujishima, Tomonori, Yoshida, Haruhiko, Kawabe, Takao, Omata, Masao·2005·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was introduced recently as a therapeutic modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), an alternative to percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT), which is coming into use worldwide. Previously reported treatment efficacy and complication rates have varied considerably. METHODS: Between February 1999 and February 2003, the authors performed 1000 treatments of RFA to 2140 HCC nodules in 664 patients with a cooled‐tip electrode at the University of Tokyo Hospital (Tokyo, Japan). Short‐term and long‐term complications were analyzed by treatment and session basis. Cumulative survival was also assessed in 319 patients who received RFA as primary treatment (naive patients) and 345 patients who received RFA for recurrent tumor after previous treatment including resection, PEIT, microwave coagulation therapy, and transarterial embolization (nonnaive patients). RESULTS: A total of 40 major complications (4.0% per treatment, 1.9% per session) and 17 minor complications (1.7% per treatment, 0.82% per session) were observed during the observation period until March 31, 2004. There were no treatment‐related deaths. Surgical intervention was required in one case each of bile peritonitis and duodenal perforation. The cumulative survival rates at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 94.7%, 86.1%, 77.7%, 67.4%, and 54.3% for naive patients, whereas the cumulative survival rates were 91.8%, 75.6%, 62.4%, 53.7%, and 38.2% for nonnaive patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The authors confirmed the safety and efficacy of RFA for HCC in a large‐scale series and long‐term prognosis was satisfactory. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.20892

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 778

Metadata

Authors
Tateishi, R., Shiina, S., Teratani, T., Obi, S., Sato, S., Koike, Y., Fujishima, T., Yoshida, H., Kawabe, T., & Omata, M.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-02-02
Volume
103
Issue
6
Pages
1201-1209
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1563869372
Cited by
778
References
0
FWCI
32.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of 1000 cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.20892
The paper
Tateishi, R., Shiina, S., Teratani, T., Obi, S., Sato, S., Koike, Y., Fujishima, T., Yoshida, H., Kawabe, T., & Omata, M. (2005). Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis of 1000 cases. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20892

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.