The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Response and resistance in 300 patients with BCR‐ABL–positive leukemias treated with imatinib in a single center: A 4.5‐year follow‐up
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The advent of imatinib has considerably changed the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Early studies demonstrated high rates of hematologic and cytogenetic responses in all phases of the disease after limited observation periods. METHODS: The authors evaluated long‐term outcome, rates of response, and resistance in 300 patients with BCR‐ABL–positive leukemias (CML in chronic phase after failure to respond to interferon‐alpha [CP], n = 139; accelerated phase [AP], n = 80; myeloid blast crisis [BC], n = 76; lymphoid BC and Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia, n = 5) who entered clinical trials with imatinib in a single center after an observation time of 4.5 years. RESULTS: In CP, hematologic remission was achieved in 97% and major (MCR) and complete cytogenetic remission (CCR) in 61% and 49% of patients, respectively. The chance to achieve MCR was higher in patients commencing imatinib earlier in the course of CML. In AP, the median survival period after the start of imatinib was 44 months, and MCR and CCR were observed in 31% and 26% of patients, respectively. In myeloid BC, the median survival period after the start of imatinib and after diagnosis of BC was 6 and 9 months, respectively. Hematologic resistance occurred in 25%, 41%, and 92% of patients in CP, AP, and myeloid BC, respectively, and was associated with BCR‐ABL mutations in 45% of patients and with clonal evolution in 58% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The data emphasized the need for a prolonged follow‐up of patients treated with imatinib to define the clinical potential of the drug and to establish methods to optimize therapy. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gambacorti-Passerini, C., Antolini, L., Mahon, F.-X., Guilhot, F., Deininger, M., Fava, C., Nagler, A., Della Casa, C. M., Morra, E., Abruzzese, E., et al. (2011) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djr060 · Cited by 429
Apperley, J. F., Cortes, J. E., Kim, D.-W., Roy, L., Roboz, G. J., Rosti, G., Bullorsky, E. O., Abruzzese, E., Hochhaus, A., Heim, D., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.14.3339 · Cited by 194
Self-citationWu, E. Q., Johnson, S., Beaulieu, N., Arana, M., Bollu, V., Guo, A., Coombs, J., Feng, W., & Cortes, J. (2010) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007990903396469 · Cited by 126
Jabbour, E. J., Cortes, J. E., & Kantarjian, H. M. (2013) · Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia · doi:10.1016/j.clml.2013.03.018 · Cited by 105
Augis, V., Airiau, K., Josselin, M., Turcq, B., Mahon, F.-X., & Belloc, F. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078582 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Lahaye, T., Riehm, B., Berger, U., Paschka, P., Müller, M. C., Kreil, S., Merx, K., Schwindel, U., Schoch, C., Hehlmann, R., & Hochhaus, A.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-03
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1659-1669
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1978514731
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response and resistance in 300 patients with BCR‐ABL–positive leukemias treated with imatinib in a single center: A 4.5‐year follow‐up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.20922
- The paper
- Lahaye, T., Riehm, B., Berger, U., Paschka, P., Müller, M. C., Kreil, S., Merx, K., Schwindel, U., Schoch, C., Hehlmann, R., & Hochhaus, A. (2005). Response and resistance in 300 patients with BCR‐ABL–positive leukemias treated with imatinib in a single center: A 4.5‐year follow‐up. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20922
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.