Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Survival of metastatic breast carcinoma patients over a 20‐year period: A retrospective analysis based on individual patient data from six consecutive studies

Open access
Gennari, Alessandra, Conte, PierFranco, Rosso, Riccardo, Orlandini, Cinzia, Bruzzi, Paolo·2005·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The expectation of improvement in patient survival with administration of new chemotherapy agents for metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC) is not consistently supported by data from clinical trials, which are often underpowered and have not detected moderate survival advantage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of new agents on prognosis of MBC patients enrolled in clinical trials of first‐line chemotherapy. METHODS: Between 1983 and 2001, 640 MBC patients were entered into 6 consecutive trials; the present analysis was limited to patients. The date of diagnosis of metastatic breast disease was used to define 5 arbitrarily chosen 3‐year time cohorts, 1983–1986, 1987–1989, 1992–1994, 1995–1997, and 1998–2001. Multivariate proportion of hazard (PH) models were used to evaluate changes in overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) over time and to detect changes associated with the use of taxanes, while adjusting for differences in baseline factors among 5 cohorts. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were evenly distributed across the 5 cohorts. Median OS was 18 months, 17.2 months, 19.2 months, 26.1 months, and 23.6 months, respectively, in cohorts 1983–1986, 1987–1989, 1992–1994, 1995–1997, 1998–2001 (P < 0.0001). Age, performance status, relapse‐free survival, type of adjuvant treatment, metastatic site, and taxane first‐line chemotherapy were all associated with survival. These data failed to provide an indication of temporal trend and suggested a reduction in hazard of death in two cohorts (1995–1997 and 1998–2001) where taxane was added to first‐line chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis provided evidence of improvement in prognosis of MBC patients that was associated with use of modern chemotherapeutic agents independent of time. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.21359

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Gennari, A., Conte, P., Rosso, R., Orlandini, C., & Bruzzi, P.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10-03
Volume
104
Issue
8
Pages
1742-1750
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1596105818
Cited by
280
References
18
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival of metastatic breast carcinoma patients over a 20‐year period: A retrospective analysis based on individual patient data from six consecutive studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.21359
The paper
Gennari, A., Conte, P., Rosso, R., Orlandini, C., & Bruzzi, P. (2005). Survival of metastatic breast carcinoma patients over a 20‐year period: A retrospective analysis based on individual patient data from six consecutive studies. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21359

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.