The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pathologic features of endometrial carcinoma associated with HNPCC: A comparison with sporadic endometrial carcinoma
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endometrial carcinoma is a common malignancy in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC). Like colon carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma is diagnosed at an earlier age in women with HNPCC. In contrast to colon carcinoma, the pathologic features of endometrial carcinoma in HNPCC have not been studied in detail. It was the purpose of this study to pathologically characterize a series of HNPCC associated endometrial carcinomas. METHODS: Fifty women with HNPCC and endometrial carcinoma were analyzed from four different hereditary cancer registries. H&E stained slides and pathology reports were reviewed for clinically important pathologic features of endometrial carcinoma. These results were compared with those for two different groups of sporadic endometrial carcinoma – women younger than age 50 years (n = 42) and women of all ages with tumors demonstrating microsatellite instability (MSI‐high) secondary to methylation of MLH1 (n = 26). RESULTS: Nearly one‐fourth of HNPCC patients in this study had endometrial tumors with pathologic features that would require adjuvant therapy after hysterectomy. There was a trend toward the HNPCC patients having more nonendometrioid tumors; all of these patients were carriers of MSH2 mutations. Such nonendometrioid tumors were extremely rare in the MLH1 methylated group. A subset of MLH1 methylated sporadic tumors demonstrated a unique, ‘undifferentiated’ histology that was not observed in HNPCC or the young group. CONCLUSION: Data suggest a genotype–phenotype relation in which microsatellite instability resulting from MLH1 methylation is almost exclusively associated with classical or ‘undifferentiated’ endometrioid tumors, whereas microsatellite instability secondary to MSH2 mutation can result in a more variable histologic spectrum of endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 2006. © 2005 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer
Colombo, N., Creutzberg, C., Amant, F., Bosse, T., Gonzalez-Martin, A., Ledermann, J., Marth, C., Nout, R., Querleu, D., Mirza, M. R., et al. (2016) · International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · doi:10.1097/igc.0000000000000609 · Cited by 767
Lindor, N. M., Petersen, G. M., Hadley, D. W., Kinney, A. Y., Miesfeldt, S., Lu, K. H., Lynch, P., Burke, W., & Press, N. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.12.1507 · Cited by 629
Self-citationMolecular Genetics of Endometrial Carcinoma
Bell, D. W., & Ellenson, L. H. (2019) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-020117-043609 · Cited by 304
Mismatch Repair Deficiency and Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade
Lee, V., Murphy, A., Le, D. T., & Diaz, L. A. (2016) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0046 · Cited by 283
Murali, R., Davidson, B., Fadare, O., Carlson, J. A., Crum, C. P., Gilks, C. B., Irving, J. A., Malpica, A., Matias-Guiu, X., McCluggage, W. G., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Gynecological Pathology · doi:10.1097/pgp.0000000000000491 · Cited by 278
Metadata
- Authors
- Broaddus, R. R., Lynch, H. T., Chen, L., Daniels, M. S., Conrad, P., Munsell, M. F., White, K. G., Luthra, R., & Lu, K. H.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12-23
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-94
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2019940629
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathologic features of endometrial carcinoma associated with HNPCC: A comparison with sporadic endometrial carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.21560
- The paper
- Broaddus, R. R., Lynch, H. T., Chen, L., Daniels, M. S., Conrad, P., Munsell, M. F., White, K. G., Luthra, R., & Lu, K. H. (2006). Pathologic features of endometrial carcinoma associated with HNPCC: A comparison with sporadic endometrial carcinoma. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21560
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.