The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, accounting for approximately 36,000 diagnoses of invasive carcinoma annually. The most common histologic type, endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EC), accounts for 75–80% of patients. The objective of this work was to estimate the prevalence of concurrent carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of the precursor lesion, atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). METHODS: This prospective cohort study included women who had a community diagnosis of AEH. Diagnostic biopsy specimens were reviewed independently by three gynecologic pathologists who used International Society of Gynecologic Pathologists/World Health Organization criteria. Study participants underwent hysterectomy within 12 weeks of entry onto protocol without interval treatment. The hysterectomy slides also were reviewed by the study pathologists, and their findings were used in the subsequent analyses. RESULTS: Between November 1998 and June 2003, 306 women were enrolled on the study. Of these, 17 women were not included in the analysis: Two patients had unreadable slides because of poor processing or insufficient tissue, 2 patients had only slides that were not endometrial, the slides for 5 patients were not available for review, and 8 of the hysterectomy specimens were excluded because they showed evidence of interval intervention, either progestin effect or ablation. In total, 289 patients were included in the current analysis. The study panel review of the AEH biopsy specimens was interpreted as follows: 74 of 289 specimens (25.6%) were diagnosed as less than AEH, 115 of 289 specimens (39.8%) were diagnosed as AEH, and 84 of 289 specimens (29.1%) were diagnosed as endometrial carcinoma. In 5.5% (16 of 289 specimens), there was no consensus on the biopsy diagnosis. The rate of concurrent endometrial carcinoma for analyzed specimens was 42.6% (123 of 289 specimens). Of these, 30.9% (38 of 123 specimens) were myoinvasive, and 10.6% (13 of 123 specimens) involved the outer 50% of the myometrium. Among the women who had hysterectomy specimens with carcinoma, 14 of 74 women (18.9%) had a study panel biopsy consensus diagnosis of less than AEH, 45 of 115 women (39.1%) had a study panel biopsy consensus diagnosis of AEH, and 54 of 84 women (64.3%) had a study panel diagnosis of carcinoma. Among women who had no consensus in their biopsy diagnosis, 10 of 16 women (62.5%) had carcinoma in their hysterectomy specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of endometrial carcinoma in patients who had a community hospital biopsy diagnosis of AEH was high (42.6%). When considering management strategies for women who have a biopsy diagnosis of AEH, clinicians and patients should take into account the considerable rate of concurrent carcinoma. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
New concepts for an old problem: the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia
Sanderson, P. A., Critchley, H. O. D., Williams, A. R. W., Arends, M. J., & Saunders, P. T. K. (2016) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmw042 · Cited by 323
Zaino, R. J., Kauderer, J., Trimble, C. L., Silverberg, S. G., Curtin, J. P., Lim, P. C., & Gallup, D. G. (2006) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.21649 · Cited by 253
Self-citationThe Oncogenic Potential of Endometrial Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Lee, S. C., Kaunitz, A. M., Sanchez-Ramos, L., & Rhatigan, R. M. (2010) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0b013e3181f74864 · Cited by 232
PIK3CA and PTEN Mutations in Uterine Endometrioid Carcinoma and Complex Atypical Hyperplasia
Hayes, M. P., Wang, H., Espinal-Witter, R., Douglas, W., Solomon, G. J., Baker, S. J., & Ellenson, L. H. (2006) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1375 · Cited by 218
van Hanegem, N., Prins, M. M. C., Bongers, M. Y., Opmeer, B. C., Sahota, D. S., Mol, B. W. J., & Timmermans, A. (2016) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.12.008 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Trimble, C. L., Kauderer, J., Zaino, R., Silverberg, S., Lim, P. C., Burke, J. J., Alberts, D., & Curtin, J.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-02-03
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 812-819
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2024827041
- Cited by
- 601
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.21650
- The paper
- Trimble, C. L., Kauderer, J., Zaino, R., Silverberg, S., Lim, P. C., Burke, J. J., Alberts, D., & Curtin, J. (2006). Concurrent endometrial carcinoma in women with a biopsy diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21650
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.