The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cytoreductive surgery followed by intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion: Analysis of morbidity and mortality in 209 peritoneal surface malignancies treated with closed abdomen technique
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective Phase II study was to analyze morbidity and mortality of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) in the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies. METHODS: A total of 205 patients (50 with peritoneal mesothelioma, 49 with pseudomyxoma peritonei, 41 with ovarian cancer, 32 with abdominal sarcomatosis, 13 with colon cancer, 12 with gastric cancer, and 8 with carcinomatosis from other origins) underwent 209 consecutive procedures. Four patients underwent the intervention twice because of disease relapse. There were 70 men and 135 women. Mean age was 52 years (range, 22–76 yrs). CRS was performed by using peritonectomy procedures. IPHP through the closed abdomen technique was conducted with a preheated (42.5 °C) perfusate containing cisplatin + mitomycin C or cisplatin + doxorubicin. RESULTS: Major morbidity rate was 12%. The most significant complications were 23 anastomotic leaks or bowel perforations, 4 abdominal bleeds, and 4 sepses. Operative mortality rate was 0.9%. On logistic regression model multivariate analysis, extent of cytoreduction (odds ratio [OR], 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29–6.40) and dose of cisplatin for IPHP ≥ 240 mg (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.24–7.90) were independent risk factors for major morbidity. Ten patients presented with Grade 3 to 4 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: CRS + IPHP presented acceptable morbidity, toxicity, and mortality rates, all of which support prospective Phase III clinical trials. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reporting results of cancer treatment
Miller, A. B., Hoogstraten, B., Staquet, M., & Winkler, A. (1981) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19810101)47:1<207::aid-cncr2820470134>3.0.co;2-6 · Cited by 7,793
Verwaal, V. J., van Ruth, S., de Bree, E., van Slooten, G. W., van Tinteren, H., Boot, H., & Zoetmulder, F. A. N. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.04.187 · Cited by 2,049
Sugarbaker, P. H. (1995) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199501000-00004 · Cited by 1,543
Glehen, O., Kwiatkowski, F., Sugarbaker, P. H., Elias, D., Levine, E. A., De Simone, M., Barone, R., Yonemura, Y., Cavaliere, F., Quenet, F., et al. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.10.012 · Cited by 1,184
Self-citationJain, R. K., & Baxter, L. T. (1988) · PubMed · Cited by 714
Bozzetti, F., Braga, M., Gianotti, L., Gavazzi, C., & Mariani, L. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06578-3 · Cited by 494 · cited 1×
“It classifies the postoperative complications as G1, no complications; G2, minor self-limiting complications; G3, major complications (requiring reoperation or intensive care unit admission or interventional radiology); and G4, in-hospital mortality.(12) Grading of toxicity was performed according to World Health Orga…”
MethodSelf-citationElias, D., Blot, F., El Otmany, A., Antoun, S., Lasser, P., Boige, V., Rougier, P., & Ducreux, M. (2001) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20010701)92:1<71::aid-cncr1293>3.0.co;2-9 · Cited by 431
Gléhen, O., Cotte, E., Schreiber, V., Sayag-Beaujard, A. C., Vignal, J., & Gilly, F. N. (2004) · British journal of surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4473 · Cited by 192
Deraco, M., Baratti, D., Inglese, M. G., Allaria, B., Andreola, S., Gavazzi, C., & Kusamura, S. (2004) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/aso.2004.07.002 · Cited by 163
Self-citationMilosevic, M., Fyles, A., & Hill, R. P. (1999) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00512-4 · Cited by 139
Cited by
New standard of care for appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome?
Sugarbaker, P. H. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70539-8 · Cited by 658
Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei: A population based study
Smeenk, R. M., van Velthuysen, M. L. F., Verwaal, V. J., & Zoetmulder, F. A. N. (2008) · European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO) · doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.002 · Cited by 555
Chua, T. C., Yan, T. D., Saxena, A., & Morris, D. L. (2009) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181a45d86 · Cited by 532
Metadata
- Authors
- Kusamura, S., Younan, R., Baratti, D., Costanzo, P., Favaro, M., Gavazzi, C., & Deraco, M.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-02-02
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1144-1153
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2071005971
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 16.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cytoreductive surgery followed by intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion: Analysis of morbidity and mortality in 209 peritoneal surface malignancies treated with closed abdomen technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.21708
- The paper
- Kusamura, S., Younan, R., Baratti, D., Costanzo, P., Favaro, M., Gavazzi, C., & Deraco, M. (2006). Cytoreductive surgery followed by intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion: Analysis of morbidity and mortality in 209 peritoneal surface malignancies treated with closed abdomen technique. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.