Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Survival after hepatic resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: A population‐based study

Cummings, Linda C., Payes, Jonathan D., Cooper, Gregory S.·2007·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: Hepatectomy is the standard of care for patients with colorectal cancer who have isolated hepatic metastases; however, the long‐term survival benefits of hepatectomy in this population have not been characterized well outside of case series. For the current study, a population‐based database was used to compare the survival of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer who did and did not undergo hepatectomy. METHODS.: Patients aged ≥65 years with incident colorectal cancer who were diagnosed from 1991 to 2001 were identified from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)‐Medicare database. Liver metastasis diagnoses, colorectal resections, and hepatectomies were identified from hospital, outpatient, and physician‐supplier claims. Patients who did not undergo colorectal resection were excluded. Five‐year survival from the time of cancer diagnosis was determined by the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate survival. RESULTS.: Among 13,599 patients who were identified with incident colorectal cancer and liver metastases, 7673 patients (56.4%) presented with stage IV disease, and the remaining patients presented with earlier stage disease and developed subsequent metastases. Only 833 patients (6.1%) in the cohort underwent hepatic resection, and their 30‐day mortality rate was 4.3%. The 5‐year survival was 32.8% among patients who underwent hepatic resection, compared with 10.5% among patients who did not undergo hepatic resection (P < .0001), and better survival was observed in the subset of patients who presented initially with disease in stages I through III. In a Cox model, which was controlled for age, sex, race, comorbidities, and stage at presentation, lack of hepatic resection was associated with a 2.78‐fold increased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS.: Although hepatectomy rates among patients with colorectal cancer were low, hepatic resection was associated with improved survival. Cancer 2007 © 2007 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.22448

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Cummings, L. C., Payes, J. D., & Cooper, G. S.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01-19
Volume
109
Issue
4
Pages
718-726
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2070161887
Cited by
335
References
1
FWCI
8.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival after hepatic resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: A population‐based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.22448
The paper
Cummings, L. C., Payes, J. D., & Cooper, G. S. (2007). Survival after hepatic resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: A population‐based study. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22448

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.