Cited by 198Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningDigital Radiography and Breast ImagingWomen's cancer prevention and management

Reported drop in mammography: Is this cause for concern?

Open access
Breen, Nancy, A. Cronin, Kathleen, Meissner, Helen I., Taplin, Stephen H., Tangka, Florence K., Tiro, Jasmin A., McNeel, Timothy S.·2007·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Timely screening with mammography can prevent a substantial number of deaths from breast cancer. The objective of this brief was to ascertain whether recent use of mammography has dropped nationally. METHODS: The authors assessed the trend in mammography rates from 1987 through 2005. Then, they used the 2000 and 2005 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) estimates to characterize trends and current patterns in mammography use. RESULTS: After robust, rapid increases in reported use of mammography by women in the U.S. since 1987, estimates from the 2005 NHIS showed a decline compared with 2000 (from 70% to 66%). Although it was small, this decline may be cause for concern, because it signals a change in direction. CONCLUSIONS: This report establishes for the nation what already has been observed in some local data. The results confirmed that the use of mammography may be falling. This change needs to be monitored carefully and also may call for intervention. Cancer 2007. Published 2007 by the American Cancer Society

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.22723

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stable or declining breast cancer trends by the early 2000s are linked to a reduced prevalence of menopausal hormone-replacement therapy and possibly a plateauing in screening participation.

    “linked to a reduced prevalence of menopausal hormone-replacement therapy and possibly a plateauing in screening participation.47,48”

    From Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. (2024) · cites this paper as [48]

    In the passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable), the paper reports that breast cancer incidence leveled off or possibly declined in 2003 and suggests that leveling or declining mammography use may partly explain it. The paper does not address reduced menopausal hormone-replacement therapy use, so that part of the attributed explanation is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 198

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Data shows decline in Florida mammography rates. Jackson- ville Business Journal. Available online: http://jacksonville. bizjournals.com/jacksonville/stories/2004/06/14/daily6. html. Accessed February 15, 2007.
  2. Ryerson AB, Miller J, Eheman CR, White MC. Use of mammograms among women aged !40 years-United States, 2000-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007; 56:49-51.

Authors
Breen, N., A. Cronin, K., Meissner, H. I., Taplin, S. H., Tangka, F. K., Tiro, J. A., & McNeel, T. S.
Affiliations
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Information Management Services (US)
Corresponding author
Breen, Nancy
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-04
Volume
109
Issue
12
Pages
2405-2409
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2058783285
Cited by
198
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 17
FWCI
17.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
mammography utilization, breast cancer screening, National Health Interview Survey, women's health, preventive health behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Mammography, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, United States, Incidence, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review