Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trastuzumab plus vinorelbine or taxane chemotherapy for HER2‐overexpressing metastatic breast cancer: The trastuzumab and vinorelbine or taxane study

Burstein, Harold J., Keshaviah, Aparna, Baron, Ari D., Hart, Ronald D., Lambert‐Falls, Rosemary, Marcom, P. Kelly, Gelman, Rebecca, Winer, Eric P.·2007·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: The optimal trastuzumab‐based chemotherapy regimen for HER2‐overexpressing, metastatic breast cancer is not known. The tr astuzumab a nd vi norelbine o r ta xane (TRAVIOTA) study was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial that was designed to compare these regimens. METHODS.: Eligible patients had HER2‐overexpressing, metastatic breast cancer and had received no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either trastuzumab with weekly vinorelbine therapy or weekly taxane therapy (paclitaxel or docetaxel at the investigator's choice). Originally planned for 250 patients, the study was closed because of poor accrual with 81 evaluable patients, including 41 patients who received vinorelbine and 40 patients who received taxane. RESULTS.: Response rates were 51% and 40% for the vinorelbine/trastuzumab arm and the taxane/trastuzumab arm, respectively (Fisher exact test; P = .37). The median time to disease progression was 8.5 months and 6.0 months for the vinorelbine‐ and taxane‐based arms, respectively (log‐rank test; P = .09). Treatment with either regimen generally was well tolerated, yielding comparable rates of neurologic and gastrointestinal toxicity. Vinorelbine‐based treatment was associated with more anemia and neutropenia and with 2 episodes of cardiotoxicity. Taxane‐based therapy was associated with more dermatologic toxicity, myalgias, and fluid retention. CONCLUSIONS.: Both vinorelbine/trastuzumab and taxane/trastuzumab treatments were active as first‐line therapy for HER2‐positive, metastatic breast cancer and had comparable rates of efficacy and tolerability. The toxicities observed were the result of recognized side effects associated with each of the chemotherapy agents and schedules. These data can inform treatment decision making in this clinical setting. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.22885

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Burstein, H. J., Keshaviah, A., Baron, A. D., Hart, R. D., Lambert‐Falls, R., Marcom, P. K., Gelman, R., & Winer, E. P.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-20
Volume
110
Issue
5
Pages
965-972
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1988737162
Cited by
214
References
1
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trastuzumab plus vinorelbine or taxane chemotherapy for HER2‐overexpressing metastatic breast cancer: The trastuzumab and vinorelbine or taxane study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.22885
The paper
Burstein, H. J., Keshaviah, A., Baron, A. D., Hart, R. D., Lambert‐Falls, R., Marcom, P. K., Gelman, R., & Winer, E. P. (2007). Trastuzumab plus vinorelbine or taxane chemotherapy for HER2‐overexpressing metastatic breast cancer: The trastuzumab and vinorelbine or taxane study. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22885

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.