The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta‐analysis and systematic review of the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants as cancer treatment: Impact on survival and bleeding complications
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND.: Preclinical evidence suggests that anticoagulants, in particular the low‐molecular‐weight heparins (LMWH), exert an antitumor effect, whereas clinical trials have reported conflicting results. The authors conducted a comprehensive, systematic review and meta‐analysis of the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to evaluate the impact of anticoagulants on survival and safety in cancer patients without venous thromboembolism. METHODS.: A comprehensive systematic literature review of RCTs was performed without language restrictions through May 2006 with subsequent updates to the end of 2006, including an exhaustive search of electronic databases, major conference proceedings, article references, and content experts. Two reviewers extracted data independently. Primary study outcomes were 1‐year overall mortality and all bleeding complications. Major and fatal bleeding complications were secondary outcomes. RESULTS.: Across all 11 studies that were identified, anticoagulation significantly decreased 1‐year overall mortality with a relative risk (RR) of 0.905 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.847–0.967; P = .003). The RR for mortality was 0.877 (95% CI, 0.789–0.975; P = .015) for LMWH, compared with an RR of 0.942 (95% CI, 0.854–1.040; P = .239) for warfarin, resulting in an absolute risk difference (ARD) of 8% for LMWH and an ARD of 3% for warfarin. Improved survival with anticoagulation may be dependent on tumor type. Major bleeding episodes occurred less frequently in patients who received LMWH (ARD, 1%) compared with patients who received warfarin (ARD, 11.5%; P < .0001). Overall, fatal bleeding occurred rarely (ARD, 0.32%; P = .542). CONCLUSIONS.: Anticoagulants, particularly LMWH, significantly improved overall survival in cancer patients without venous thrombosis while increasing the risk for bleeding complications. However, given the limitations of available data, the use of anticoagulants as antineoplastic therapy cannot be recommended until additional RCTs confirm these results. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
(1959) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/22.4.719 · Cited by 14,689
The combination of estimates from different experiments
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001666 · Cited by 5,380
Tumors: Wounds That Do Not Heal
Flier, J. S., Underhill, L. H., & Dvorak, H. F. (1986) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198612253152606 · Cited by 4,391
Moher, D., Jadad, A. R., Nichol, G., Penman, M., Tugwell, P., & Walsh, S. (1995) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(94)00031-w · Cited by 1,308
Yusuf, S. (1991) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470010097038 · Cited by 1,014 · cited 1×
“Statistically significant differences between subgroups were studied by comparing the ratio of the difference in the natural logarithm of the subgroup relative risk (RR) estimates and the standard error of the difference with the standard normal distribution.(65,66) The presence of potential publication or selection b…”
MethodThe strengths and limitations of meta-analyses based on aggregate data
Lyman, G. H., & Kuderer, N. M. (2005) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-14 · Cited by 250
Self-citation
Cited by
Lyman, G. H., Bohlke, K., Khorana, A. A., Kuderer, N. M., Lee, A. Y., Arcelus, J. I., Balaban, E. P., Clarke, J. M., Flowers, C. R., Francis, C. W., et al. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.59.7351 · Cited by 1,371
Self-citationLyman, G. H., Carrier, M., Ay, C., Di Nisio, M., Hicks, L. K., Khorana, A. A., Leavitt, A. D., Lee, A. Y. Y., Macbeth, F., Morgan, R. L., et al. (2021) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003442 · Cited by 893
Self-citationWalker, A. J., Card, T. R., West, J., Crooks, C., & Grainge, M. J. (2013) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.10.021 · Cited by 512
Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines
Mandalà, M., Falanga, A., & Roila, F. (2011) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr392 · Cited by 512
Cancer Cell Adhesion and Metastasis: Selectins, Integrins, and the Inhibitory Potential of Heparins
Bendas, G., & Borsig, L. (2012) · International Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1155/2012/676731 · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuderer, N. M., Khorana, A. A., Lyman, G. H., & Francis, C. W.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-08-20
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1149-1161
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2013564192
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta‐analysis and systematic review of the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants as cancer treatment: Impact on survival and bleeding complications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.22892
- The paper
- Kuderer, N. M., Khorana, A. A., Lyman, G. H., & Francis, C. W. (2007). A meta‐analysis and systematic review of the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants as cancer treatment: Impact on survival and bleeding complications. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22892
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.