Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 217

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neurotoxicity of bortezomib therapy in multiple myeloma: A single‐center experience and review of the literature

Open access
Badros, Ashraf, Goloubeva, Olga, Dalal, Jay S., Can, Ilyas, Thompson, Jennifer, Rapoport, Aaron P., Heyman, Meyer, Akpek, Gorgon, Fenton, Robert G.·2007·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: Bortezomib is active in heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients; the dose‐limiting toxicity is peripheral neuropathy (PN). METHODS.: The authors retrospectively reviewed the incidence, severity, and risk factors for PN in 78 patients who received bortezomib. The median age was 57 years (range, 33–80 years), 62% of patients were men, and 37% of patients were African Americans. Seventeen patients (22%) had diabetes mellitus (DM), and 66 patients (85%) had received thalidomide. Before bortezomib treatment, 37% of the patients reported subjective, grade 1 or 2 PN. Patients received bortezomib alone (n = 10 patients) plus dexamethasone (n = 36 patients) and thalidomide (n = 20 patients) or chemotherapy (n = 12 patients). PN affected 52% of patients, including grade 3 and 4 PN in 15% and 7%, respectively. RESULTS.: Twelve patients stopped bortezomib because of side effects that included PN (n = 9 patients), diarrhea (n = 2 patients) and cytomegalovirus pneumonia (n = 1 patient); 11 patients had dose reductions because of PN. Grade 4 PN affected 6 patients (sensory, n = 4 patients; motor/sensory, n = 2 patients). The onset of grade 4 PN was sudden rather than cumulative. Factors that were predictive of PN grade were baseline PN (P = .002), prior thalidomide use (P = .03), and the presence of DM (P = .03). Multiple myeloma responses included complete, near complete, and partial responses in 5% of patients, 10% of patients, and 27% of patients, respectively. Responses were independent of PN and of whether bortezomib was combined with chemotherapy or thalidomide. Patients remained on therapy longer for a median of 5 cycles (range, 2–36 cycles) when they received bortezomib plus thalidomide versus 3 cycles (range, 1–19 cycles) for the other combinations. PN therapy was mostly supportive. It was noteworthy that 6 of 9 patients with PN who received lenalidomide as salvage therapy after bortezomib had significant improvement in their symptoms. CONCLUSIONS.: The risk of bortezomib‐related PN was greater in patients who had PN and DM at baseline. The authors concluded that an unexpected, symptomatic improvement of PN on lenalidomide is worth further investigation. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.22921

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 217

Metadata

Authors
Badros, A., Goloubeva, O., Dalal, J. S., Can, I., Thompson, J., Rapoport, A. P., Heyman, M., Akpek, G., & Fenton, R. G.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-08-20
Volume
110
Issue
5
Pages
1042-1049
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2036139631
Cited by
217
References
0
FWCI
10.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurotoxicity of bortezomib therapy in multiple myeloma: A single‐center experience and review of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.22921
The paper
Badros, A., Goloubeva, O., Dalal, J. S., Can, I., Thompson, J., Rapoport, A. P., Heyman, M., Akpek, G., & Fenton, R. G. (2007). Neurotoxicity of bortezomib therapy in multiple myeloma: A single‐center experience and review of the literature. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22921

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.