Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy of lamotrigine in the management of chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy: A phase 3 randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial, N01C3

Rao, Ravi D., Flynn, Patrick J., Sloan, Jeff A., Wong, Gilbert Y., Novotny, Paul, Johnson, David B., Gross, Howard M., Renno, Samer I., Nashawaty, Mohammed, Loprinzi, Charles L.·2008·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: Lamotrigine, an antiepileptic agent, has been reported as being effective in reducing symptoms of neuropathy associated with various etiologies. Based on such data, a multicenter double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of lamotrigine on pain and other neuropathic symptoms due to chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). METHODS.: Patients with symptomatic CIPN with symptom scores of either 1) >3 on a 0‐10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) or 2) >1 on the 0‐3 the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) neuropathy scale (ENS) were eligible (higher numbers corresponding to greater severity of symptoms in both scales). Patients were randomly assigned to receive lamotrigine (target dose of 300 mg/day) or placebo for 10 weeks. Endpoints were measured biweekly. RESULTS.: In all, 131 patients were enrolled. Both groups were well matched at baseline. Over the 10‐week period of the trial, the average pain scores (NRS) for the lamotrigine and placebo arms declined in both arms, with no statistically significant difference noted between the changes in the 2 groups (0.3 and 0.5 unit reduction from baseline, respectively; P = .56). Similarly, decreases in the ENS with therapy were not statistically different (0.4 and 0.3, respectively; P = .3). Changes in other subjective symptom scales were also not found to be statistically different between the 2 groups. Toxicities were mild and similar in each group. CONCLUSIONS.: The results suggest that lamotrigine is not effective for relieving neuropathic symptoms in patients because of CIPN. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.23482

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Rao, R. D., Flynn, P. J., Sloan, J. A., Wong, G. Y., Novotny, P., Johnson, D. B., Gross, H. M., Renno, S. I., Nashawaty, M., & Loprinzi, C. L.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-21
Volume
112
Issue
12
Pages
2802-2808
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2047384875
Cited by
193
References
3
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy of lamotrigine in the management of chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy: A phase 3 randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial, N01C3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.23482
The paper
Rao, R. D., Flynn, P. J., Sloan, J. A., Wong, G. Y., Novotny, P., Johnson, D. B., Gross, H. M., Renno, S. I., Nashawaty, M., & Loprinzi, C. L. (2008). Efficacy of lamotrigine in the management of chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy: A phase 3 randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial, N01C3. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23482

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.