Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: Methods, protocol, and measures

Open access
Freund, Karen M., Battaglia, Tracy A., Calhoun, Elizabeth, Dudley, Donald J., Fiscella, Kevin, Paskett, Electra, Raich, Peter C., Roetzheim, Richard G., The Patient Navigation Research Program Group·2008·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: Patient, provider, and systems barriers contribute to delays in cancer care, a lower quality of care, and poorer outcomes in vulnerable populations, including low‐income, underinsured, and racial/ethnic minority populations. Patient navigation is emerging as an intervention to address this problem, but navigation requires a clear definition and a rigorous testing of its effectiveness. Pilot programs have provided some evidence of benefit, but have been limited by evaluation of single‐site interventions and varying definitions of navigation. To overcome these limitations, a 9‐site National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program (PNRP) was initiated. METHODS.: The PNRP is charged with designing, implementing, and evaluating a generalizable patient navigation program targeting vulnerable populations. Through a formal committee structure, the PNRP has developed a definition of patient navigation and metrics to assess the process and outcomes of patient navigation in diverse settings, compared with concurrent continuous control groups. RESULTS.: The PNRP defines patient navigation as support and guidance offered to vulnerable persons with abnormal cancer screening or a cancer diagnosis, with the goal of overcoming barriers to timely, quality care. Primary outcomes of the PNRP are 1) time to diagnostic resolution; 2) time to initiation of cancer treatment; 3) patient satisfaction with care; and 4) cost effectiveness, for breast, cervical, colon/rectum, and/or prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS.: The metrics to assess the processes and outcomes of patient navigation have been developed for the NCI‐sponsored PNRP. If the metrics are found to be valid and reliable, they may prove useful to other investigators. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.23960

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Freund, K. M., Battaglia, T. A., Calhoun, E., Dudley, D. J., Fiscella, K., Paskett, E., Raich, P. C., Roetzheim, R. G., & The Patient Navigation Research Program Group
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12-04
Volume
113
Issue
12
Pages
3391-3399
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1593273041
Cited by
340
References
35
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: Methods, protocol, and measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.23960
The paper
Freund, K. M., Battaglia, T. A., Calhoun, E., Dudley, D. J., Fiscella, K., Paskett, E., Raich, P. C., Roetzheim, R. G., & The Patient Navigation Research Program Group. (2008). National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: Methods, protocol, and measures. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23960

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.