The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: Methods, protocol, and measures
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND.: Patient, provider, and systems barriers contribute to delays in cancer care, a lower quality of care, and poorer outcomes in vulnerable populations, including low‐income, underinsured, and racial/ethnic minority populations. Patient navigation is emerging as an intervention to address this problem, but navigation requires a clear definition and a rigorous testing of its effectiveness. Pilot programs have provided some evidence of benefit, but have been limited by evaluation of single‐site interventions and varying definitions of navigation. To overcome these limitations, a 9‐site National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program (PNRP) was initiated. METHODS.: The PNRP is charged with designing, implementing, and evaluating a generalizable patient navigation program targeting vulnerable populations. Through a formal committee structure, the PNRP has developed a definition of patient navigation and metrics to assess the process and outcomes of patient navigation in diverse settings, compared with concurrent continuous control groups. RESULTS.: The PNRP defines patient navigation as support and guidance offered to vulnerable persons with abnormal cancer screening or a cancer diagnosis, with the goal of overcoming barriers to timely, quality care. Primary outcomes of the PNRP are 1) time to diagnostic resolution; 2) time to initiation of cancer treatment; 3) patient satisfaction with care; and 4) cost effectiveness, for breast, cervical, colon/rectum, and/or prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS.: The metrics to assess the processes and outcomes of patient navigation have been developed for the NCI‐sponsored PNRP. If the metrics are found to be valid and reliable, they may prove useful to other investigators. Cancer 2008. © 2008 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & MacKenzie, C. R. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 · Cited by 49,742
Impact of Event Scale: A Measure of Subjective Stress
Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 · Cited by 7,813
Capps, L. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.18.2487-b · Cited by 4,526
Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument.
Davis, T. C., Long, S. W., Jackson, R. H., Mayeaux, E. J., George, R. B., Murphy, P. W., & Crouch, M. A. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 1,597
The Pap Test and Bethesda 2014
Nayar, R., & Wilbur, D. C. (2015) · Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology · doi:10.1016/j.jasc.2015.03.003 · Cited by 1,144
Morris, N. S., MacLean, C. D., Chew, L. D., & Littenberg, B. (2006) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-7-21 · Cited by 966
Mohler, J., Bahnson, R. R., Boston, B., Busby, J. E., D'Amico, A., Eastham, J. A., Enke, C. A., George, D., Horwitz, E. M., Huben, R. P., et al. (2010) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2010.0012 · Cited by 897
Weir, H. K. (2003) · CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment · doi:10.1093/jnci/djg040 · Cited by 867
Cited by
ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)
Cardoso, F., Costa, A., Norton, L., Senkus, E., Aapro, M., André, F., Barrios, C. H., Bergh, J., Biganzoli, L., Blackwell, K. L., et al. (2014) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdu385 · Cited by 540
Patient navigation: An update on the state of the science
Paskett, E. D., Harrop, J. P., & Wells, K. J. (2011) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20111 · Cited by 458
Self-citationESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC2)
Cardoso, F., Costa, A., Norton, L., Senkus, E., Aapro, M., André, F., Barrios, C. H., Bergh, J., Biganzoli, L., Blackwell, K. L., et al. (2014) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2014.08.009 · Cited by 338
Chan, R. J., Milch, V. E., Crawford‐Williams, F., Agbejule, O. A., Joseph, R., Johal, J., Dick, N., Wallen, M. P., Ratcliffe, J., Agarwal, A., et al. (2023) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21788 · Cited by 274
Racial Differences and Disparities in Cancer Care and Outcomes
Esnaola, N. F., & Ford, M. E. (2012) · Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.soc.2012.03.012 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Freund, K. M., Battaglia, T. A., Calhoun, E., Dudley, D. J., Fiscella, K., Paskett, E., Raich, P. C., Roetzheim, R. G., & The Patient Navigation Research Program Group
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-04
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3391-3399
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1593273041
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 8.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: Methods, protocol, and measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.23960
- The paper
- Freund, K. M., Battaglia, T. A., Calhoun, E., Dudley, D. J., Fiscella, K., Paskett, E., Raich, P. C., Roetzheim, R. G., & The Patient Navigation Research Program Group. (2008). National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: Methods, protocol, and measures. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23960
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.