Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 810

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrated data from 2 randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 trials of active cellular immunotherapy with sipuleucel‐T in advanced prostate cancer

Higano, Celestia S., Schellhammer, Paul F., Small, Eric J., Burch, Patrick A., Nemunaitis, John, Yuh, Lianng, Provost, Nicole, Frohlich, Mark W.·2009·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sipuleucel‐T is an investigational active cellular immunotherapy product designed to stimulate an immune response against prostate cancer. The safety and efficacy of sipuleucel‐T was evaluated in 2 identically designed, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials (D9901 and D9902A) conducted in men with advanced prostate cancer. METHODS: A total of 225 patients were randomized in D9901 or D9902A to sipuleucel‐T (n = 147) or placebo (n = 78), given as 3 intravenous infusions approximately 2 weeks apart. Patients were followed for survival until death or a prespecified cutoff of 36 months after randomization. RESULTS: In the integrated analysis of D9901 and D9902A, patients randomized to sipuleucel‐T demonstrated a 33% reduction in the risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.10‐2.05; P = .011; log‐rank). The treatment effect remained strong after performing adjustments for imbalances in baseline prognostic factors, poststudy treatment chemotherapy use, and non–prostate cancer‐related deaths. Additional support for the activity of sipuleucel‐T is provided by the correlation between a measure of the product's potency, CD54 up‐regulation, and overall survival. The most common adverse events associated with treatment were chills, pyrexia, headache, asthenia, dyspnea, vomiting, and tremor. These events were primarily grade 1 and 2, with durations of 1 to 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: The integrated results of D9901 and D9902A demonstrate a survival benefit for patients treated with sipuleucel‐T compared with those treated with placebo. The generally modest toxicity profile, coupled with the survival benefit, suggests a favorable risk‐benefit ratio for sipuleucel‐T in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.24429

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 810

Metadata

Authors
Higano, C. S., Schellhammer, P. F., Small, E. J., Burch, P. A., Nemunaitis, J., Yuh, L., Provost, N., & Frohlich, M. W.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06-17
Volume
115
Issue
16
Pages
3670-3679
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2169258216
Cited by
810
References
1
FWCI
72.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated data from 2 randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 trials of active cellular immunotherapy with sipuleucel‐T in advanced prostate cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.24429
The paper
Higano, C. S., Schellhammer, P. F., Small, E. J., Burch, P. A., Nemunaitis, J., Yuh, L., Provost, N., & Frohlich, M. W. (2009). Integrated data from 2 randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 trials of active cellular immunotherapy with sipuleucel‐T in advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24429

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.