Cited by 266Cancer survivorship and carePain Management and Opioid UsePediatric Pain Management Techniques

Cancer‐related chronic pain: Examining quality of life in diverse cancer survivors

Green, Carmen R., Hart‐Johnson, Tamera, Loeffler, Deena R.·2011·Cancer

Abstract

Background Disparities in cancer survival and pain rates negatively impact quality of life (QOL). This study examines cancer-related chronic pain (CP) and its impact on QOL in diverse cancer survivors. Methods This survey study focused on current and past pain, health, and QOL in black and white cancer survivors. Participants with breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer and multiple myeloma were recruited through the Michigan State Cancer Registry. Analysis of variance was used to examine outcome differences by pain status, race, and sex. Hierarchical regressions explored predictors for experiencing pain. Results The subjects (N = 199) were 31% black, 49% female, and 57 to 79 years old; 19.5% experienced current pain, and 42.6% reported pain since diagnosis. Women experience more pain (P Conclusions The authors extend the literature by showing that 20% of diverse cancer survivors had cancer-related CP, and 43% had experienced pain since diagnosis, revealing racial and sex disparities in cancer-related CP's incidence and impact on QOL. Having pain was related to poorer QOL in several domains and was more frequently experienced by women. Although black race was not related to pain prevalence, it was related to greater severity. This study reveals an unaddressed cancer survivorship research, clinical, and policy issue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.25761

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, C. R., Hart‐Johnson, T., & Loeffler, D. R.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Green, Carmen R.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-18
Volume
117
Issue
9
Pages
1994-2003
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1486532351
Cited by
266
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
cancer survivors, quality of life, racial disparities, sex differences, pain intensity, pain interference, disability, depressive symptoms, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, multiple myeloma, survivorship
MeSH terms
Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Pain, Quality of Life, Socioeconomic Factors, Survivors, Black People, White People, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review