Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A nomogram to predict postresection 5‐year overall survival for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma

Open access
Zivanovic, Oliver, Jacks, Lindsay M., Iasonos, Alexia, Leitao, Mario M., Soslow, Robert A., Veras, Emanuela, Chi, Dennis S., Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R., Barakat, Richard R., Brennan, Murray F., Hensley, Martee L.·2012·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical course of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is difficult to predict with the currently available categorical staging systems of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). The objective of the current study was to develop and validate a novel, clinically relevant, individualized prognostic model for patients with uterine LMS. METHODS: Patients with uterine LMS who presented at the authors' institution from 1982 to 2008 were analyzed. The nomogram model was chosen based on the clinical evidence and statistical significance of the predictors, including age at diagnosis, tumor size, histologic grade, uterine cervix involvement, extrauterine spread, distant metastases, and mitotic index. Five‐year overall survival (OS) was the predicted endpoint. The concordance probability (CP) was used as a predictive accuracy measure and compared with the CP of current staging systems. The model was internally validated using 200 bootstrap samples to correct for over fitting. RESULTS: One hundred eighty‐five of 270 patients were eligible for the nomogram analysis. The median follow‐up was 5.4 years, and the median OS was 3.75 years (95% confidence interval, 3‐6 years). The CP of the newly developed nomogram was 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.63‐0.72). This was superior to predictions based on AJCC and FIGO staging. The bootstrap‐validated CP was 0.65 with good calibration accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The authors developed and internally validated a uterine LMS‐specific nomogram to predict 5‐year OS. This novel, individualized prognostic model outperforms traditionally used categorical staging systems and may be useful for patient counseling and for better selection of patients for adjuvant therapy trials. Cancer 2012;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.26333

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Zivanovic, O., Jacks, L. M., Iasonos, A., Leitao, M. M., Soslow, R. A., Veras, E., Chi, D. S., Abu‐Rustum, N. R., Barakat, R. R., Brennan, M. F., & Hensley, M. L.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-12
Volume
118
Issue
3
Pages
660-669
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1984378867
Cited by
164
References
0
FWCI
9.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A nomogram to predict postresection 5‐year overall survival for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.26333
The paper
Zivanovic, O., Jacks, L. M., Iasonos, A., Leitao, M. M., Soslow, R. A., Veras, E., Chi, D. S., Abu‐Rustum, N. R., Barakat, R. R., Brennan, M. F., & Hensley, M. L. (2012). A nomogram to predict postresection 5‐year overall survival for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26333

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.