Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast carcinoma

Open access
Rakha, Emad A., Martin, Stewart, Lee, Andrew H. S., Morgan, David, Pharoah, Paul D. P., Hodi, Zsolt, MacMillan, Douglas, Ellis, Ian O.·2012·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although lymphovascular invasion (LVI) has been associated with a poor outcome in patients with breast cancer, it is not included in most internationally recognized staging systems, including the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) classification. This is mainly because it remains unclear whether the presence of LVI is an independent, high‐risk criterion in clinically relevant staging subgroups. METHODS: The current study was based on a large and well characterized consecutive series of patients who had operable (pathologic T1 [pT1]‐pT2, pathologic N0 [pN0]‐pN3, M0) breast cancer (3812 informative cases) who were treated according to standard protocols at a single institution and who had long‐term follow‐up to assess the prognostic value of definite LVI in clinically and molecularly relevant staging subgroups. RESULTS: LVI was strongly associated with both breast cancer‐specific survival (BCSS) and distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS) in the entire series and in different subgroups. Multivariate analyses identified LVI as an independent predictor of both BCSS and DMFS in patients with operable breast cancer overall; in the TNM clinical subgroups pT1a‐pT1c/pN0 and pT2/pN0; and in the molecular classes estrogen receptor (ER)‐positive, ER‐negative, human epidermal growth factor 2 [HER2]‐negative, and triple‐negative. In patients who had lymph node‐negative tumors, LVI could be used as a high‐risk criterion providing survival disadvantage equivalent to that provided by 1 or 2 involved lymph nodes (pN0 to pN1) and to that provided by 1 size category (pT1 to pT2). The use of immunohistochemistry for detecting an endothelial‐specific marker contributed to the prognostic significance of LVI when applied to routine LVI negative/possible cases. CONCLUSIONS: LVI provided a strong predictor of outcome in patients with invasive breast cancer and should be incorporated into breast cancer staging systems. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.26711

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Rakha, E. A., Martin, S., Lee, A. H. S., Morgan, D., Pharoah, P. D. P., Hodi, Z., MacMillan, D., & Ellis, I. O.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-16
Volume
118
Issue
15
Pages
3670-3680
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1545734177
Cited by
271
References
34
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.26711
The paper
Rakha, E. A., Martin, S., Lee, A. H. S., Morgan, D., Pharoah, P. D. P., Hodi, Z., MacMillan, D., & Ellis, I. O. (2012). The prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26711

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.