The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Does skin cancer screening save lives?: An observational study comparing trends in melanoma mortality in regions with and without screening
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: From July 1, 2003 to June 30, 2004, a population‐based skin cancer screening project was conducted in Schleswig‐Holstein, Germany. In total, 360,288 individuals aged ≥20 years were screened by means of a whole‐body examination. In this report, the authors compare trends in melanoma mortality in Schleswig‐Holstein with those in all adjacent regions, none of which had population‐based skin cancer screening. METHODS: Trends in melanoma mortality rates for Schleswig‐Holstein and the adjacent regions (Denmark and the German federal states of Mecklenburg‐Vorpommern, Hamburg, and Lower Saxony) and in Germany excluding Schleswig‐Holstein were compared. Log‐linear regression was used to assess mortality trends. RESULTS: In Schleswig‐Holstein during the pre skin cancer screening period (1998‐1999), the age‐standardized melanoma mortality rate (World standard population) was 1.9 per 100,000 for men and 1.4 per 100,000 for women. Melanoma mortality declined by 47% to 1.0 per 100,000 men and by 49% to 0.7 per 100,000 women by 2008/2009. The annual percentage change in the most recent 10‐year period (2000‐2009) was −7.5% (95% confidence interval, −14.0, −0.5) for men and −7.1% (95% confidence interval, −10.5, −2.9) for women. In each of the 4 adjacent regions and in the rest of Germany, mortality rates were stable, and the decline in Schleswig‐Holstein was significantly different from the changes observed in all of the other areas studied. CONCLUSIONS: The current data represent strong evidence, but not absolute proof, that the skin cancer screening program produced a reduction in melanoma mortality in Schleswig‐Holstein. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Screening for Skin Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
US Preventive Services Task Force, Bibbins-Domingo, K., Grossman, D. C., Curry, S. J., Davidson, K. W., Ebell, M., Epling, J. W., García, F. A. R., Gillman, M. W., Kemper, A. R., et al. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.8465 · Cited by 322
Lucas, R. M., Norval, M., Neale, R. E., Young, A. R., de Gruijl, F. R., Takizawa, Y., & van der Leun, J. C. (2014) · Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences · doi:10.1039/c4pp90033b · Cited by 158
Guido, N., Hagstrom, E. L., Ibler, E., Carneiro, C., Orrell, K. A., Kelm, R. C., Rademaker, A. W., West, D. P., & Nardone, B. (2018) · Journal of Surgical Dermatology · doi:10.18282/jsd.v3.i2.177 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Katalinic, A., Waldmann, A., Weinstock, M. A., Geller, A. C., Eisemann, N., Greinert, R., Volkmer, B., & Breitbart, E.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04-19
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 5395-5402
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1496235210
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does skin cancer screening save lives?: An observational study comparing trends in melanoma mortality in regions with and without screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.27566
- The paper
- Katalinic, A., Waldmann, A., Weinstock, M. A., Geller, A. C., Eisemann, N., Greinert, R., Volkmer, B., & Breitbart, E. (2012). Does skin cancer screening save lives?: An observational study comparing trends in melanoma mortality in regions with and without screening. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27566
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.