Cited by 168

Out‐of‐pocket health care expenditure burden for Medicare beneficiaries with cancer

Davidoff, Amy J., Erten, Mujde, Shaffer, Thomas, Shoemaker, J. Samantha, Zuckerman, Ilene H., Pandya, Naimish, Tai, Ming‐Hui, Ke, Xuehua +1 more·2013·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is increasing concern regarding the financial burden of care on cancer patients and their families. Medicare beneficiaries often have extensive comorbidities and limited financial resources, and may face substantial cost sharing even with supplemental coverage. In the current study, the authors examined out‐of‐pocket (OOP) spending and burden relative to income for Medicare beneficiaries with cancer. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study pooled data for 1997 through 2007 from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey linked to Medicare claims. Medicare beneficiaries with newly diagnosed cancer were selected using claims‐based diagnoses. Generalized linear models were used to estimate OOP spending. Logistic regression models identified factors associated with a high OOP burden, defined as spending > 20% of one's income during the cancer diagnosis and subsequent year. RESULTS: The cohort included 1868 beneficiaries with and 10,047 without cancer. Compared with the noncancer cohort, cancer patients were older, had more comorbidities, and were more likely to lack supplemental coverage. The mean OOP spending for cancer patients was $4727. Cancer patients faced an adjusted $976 ( P < .01) incremental OOP spending. Greater than one‐quarter (28%) of beneficiaries with cancer experienced a high OOP burden compared with 16% of beneficiaries without cancer ( P < .001). Supplemental insurance and higher income were found to be protective against a high OOP burden, whereas assets, comorbidity, and receipt of cancer‐directed radiation and antineoplastic therapy were associated with a higher OOP burden. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare beneficiaries with cancer face a higher OOP burden than their counterparts without cancer; some of the higher burden was explained by the higher comorbidity burden and lack of supplemental insurance noted among these patients. Financial pressures may discourage some elderly patients from pursuing treatment. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.27848

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidoff, A. J., Erten, M., Shaffer, T., Shoemaker, J. S., Zuckerman, I. H., Pandya, N., Tai, M., Ke, X., & Stuart, B.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-12-07
Volume
119
Issue
6
Pages
1257-1265
ISSN
  • 0008-543X
  • 1097-0142
Cited by
168
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review