The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age as a prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma: The gynecologic oncology group experience
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) has completed six major randomized trials in advanced ovarian carcinoma over the 15-year period between 1976 and 1990. This large database of 2123 patients provides a well-studied patient population with which to examine the importance of age as a prognostic factor. METHODS: The 2123 patients studied in the six GOG trials were analyzed as a group to determine important prognostic factors. Further analyses were then conducted to examine outcome by decade of life from younger than 40 years old to 70 years old and older and to evaluate the interaction of age with other significant prognostic variables. RESULTS: Three major prognostic factors were identified as exerting an influence on patient outcome in the overall patient population: age, volume of residual disease, and performance status. With regard to the effect of age, patients older than 69 years of age exhibited significantly poorer survival than those younger, even after correction for stage, residual disease, and performance status. This was not altered by variations in drugs, doses, and schedules; but there was no evidence that older patients tolerated intensive schedules less well than younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: Two practical conclusions result from this analysis. First, there is no evidence that modification of the drugs and schedules that make up the regimens used can overcome the adverse effect of older age. Second, age does not adversely affect the dose intensity that can be achieved; hence, age in itself is not reason to withhold or attenuate intensive chemotherapy, particularly in light of the fact that older patients have a poorer prognosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 · Cited by 13,912
Cited by
Tan, D. S. P., Rothermundt, C., Thomas, K., Bancroft, E., Eeles, R., Shanley, S., Ardern-Jones, A., Norman, A., Kaye, S. B., & Gore, M. E. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.16.1703 · Cited by 469
Clinical and Pathological Features of Ovarian Cancer in Women with Germ-Line Mutations of BRCA1
Rubin, S. C., Benjamin, I., Behbakht, K., Takahashi, H., Morgan, M. A., LiVolsi, V. A., Berchuck, A., Muto, M. G., Garber, J. E., Weber, B. L., et al. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199611073351901 · Cited by 423
Age-induced accumulation of methylmalonic acid promotes tumour progression
Gomes, A. P., Ilter, D., Low, V., Endress, J. E., Fernández-García, J., Rosenzweig, A., Schild, T., Broekaert, D., Ahmed, A., Planque, M., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2630-0 · Cited by 244
Eržen, M., Rakar, S., Klančar, B., & Syrjänen, K. (2001) · Gynecologic Oncology · doi:10.1006/gyno.2001.6382 · Cited by 160
Metabolic reprogramming: a bridge between aging and tumorigenesis
Drapela, S., Ilter, D., & Gomes, A. P. (2022) · Molecular Oncology · doi:10.1002/1878-0261.13261 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Thigpen, T., Brady, M. F., Omura, G. A., Creasman, W. T., Mcguire, W. P., Hoskins, W. J., & Williams, S.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-31
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- 606-614
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987437069
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age as a prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma: The gynecologic oncology group experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.2820710218
- The paper
- Thigpen, T., Brady, M. F., Omura, G. A., Creasman, W. T., Mcguire, W. P., Hoskins, W. J., & Williams, S. (2010). Age as a prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma: The gynecologic oncology group experience. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.2820710218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.