The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical activity of ipilimumab for metastatic uveal melanoma: A retrospective review of the Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center, and University Hospital of Lausanne experience
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Uveal melanoma exhibits a high incidence of metastases; and, to date, there is no systemic therapy that clearly improves outcomes. The anticytotoxic T‐lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (anti‐CTLA‐4) antibody ipilimumab is a standard of care for metastatic melanoma; however, the clinical activity of CTLA‐4 inhibition in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma is poorly defined. METHODS: To assess ipilimumab in this setting, the authors performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis of 4 hospitals in the United States and Europe. Clinical characteristics, toxicities, and radiographic disease burden, as determined by central, blinded radiology review, were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty‐nine patients with uveal melanoma were identified, including 34 patients who received 3 mg/kg ipilimumab and 5 who received 10 mg/kg ipilimumab. Immune‐related response criteria and modified World Health Organization criteria were used to assess the response rate (RR) and the combined response plus stable disease (SD) rate after 12 weeks, after 23 weeks, and overall (median follow‐up, 50.4 weeks [12.6 months]). At week 12, the RR was 2.6%, and the response plus SD rate was 46.%; at week 23, the RR was 2.6%, and the response plus SD rate was 28.2%. There was 1 complete response and 1 late partial response (at 100 weeks after initial SD) for an immune‐related RR of 5.1%. Immune‐related adverse events were observed in 28 patients (71.8%) and included 7 (17.9%) grade 3 and 4 events. Immune‐related adverse events were more frequent in patients who received 10 mg/kg ipilimumab than in those who received 3 mg/kg ipilimumab. The median overall survival from the first dose of ipilimumab was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval, 6.3‐13.4 months; range, 1.6‐41.6 months). Performance status, lactate dehydrogenase level, and an absolute lymphocyte count ≥1000 cells/μL at week 7 were associated significantly with survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter, retrospective analysis of 4 hospitals in the United States and Europe of patients with uveal melanoma, durable responses to ipilimumab and manageable toxicity were observed. Cancer 2013;119:3687–3695. © 2013 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delyon, J., Mateus, C., Lefeuvre, D., Lanoy, E., Zitvogel, L., Chaput, N., Roy, S., Eggermont, A. M. M., Routier, E., & Robert, C. (2013) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt027 · Cited by 318
Cited by
Targeted agents and immunotherapies: optimizing outcomes in melanoma
Luke, J. J., Flaherty, K. T., Ribas, A., & Long, G. V. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.43 · Cited by 1,254
Self-citationCancer immunotherapy: Opportunities and challenges in the rapidly evolving clinical landscape
Emens, L. A., Ascierto, P. A., Darcy, P. K., Demaria, S., Eggermont, A. M. M., Redmond, W. L., Seliger, B., & Marincola, F. M. (2017) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2017.01.035 · Cited by 566
Cardiotoxicity associated with CTLA4 and PD1 blocking immunotherapy
Heinzerling, L., Ott, P. A., Hodi, F. S., Husain, A. N., Tajmir-Riahi, A., Tawbi, H., Pauschinger, M., Gajewski, T. F., Lipson, E. J., & Luke, J. J. (2016) · Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · doi:10.1186/s40425-016-0152-y · Cited by 511
Self-citationTargeted Next Generation Sequencing Identifies Markers of Response to PD-1 Blockade
Johnson, D. B., Frampton, G. M., Rioth, M. J., Yusko, E., Xu, Y., Guo, X., Ennis, R. C., Fabrizio, D., Chalmers, Z. R., Greenbowe, J., et al. (2016) · Cancer Immunology Research · doi:10.1158/2326-6066.cir-16-0143 · Cited by 481
Self-citationMetastatic disease from uveal melanoma: treatment options and future prospects
Carvajal, R. D., Schwartz, G. K., Tezel, T., Marr, B., Francis, J. H., & Nathan, P. D. (2017) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309034 · Cited by 438
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Luke, J. J., Callahan, M. K., Postow, M. A., Romano, E., Ramaiya, N., Bluth, M., Giobbie‐Hurder, A., Lawrence, D. P., Ibrahim, N., Ott, P. A., Flaherty, K. T., Sullivan, R. J., Harding, J. J., D'Angelo, S., Dickson, M., Schwartz, G. K., Chapman, P. B., Wolchok, J. D., Hodi, F. S., & Carvajal, R. D.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-02
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 3687-3695
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1508871122
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical activity of ipilimumab for metastatic uveal melanoma: A retrospective review of the Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center, and University Hospital of Lausanne experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.28282
- The paper
- Luke, J. J., Callahan, M. K., Postow, M. A., Romano, E., Ramaiya, N., Bluth, M., Giobbie‐Hurder, A., Lawrence, D. P., Ibrahim, N., Ott, P. A., Flaherty, K. T., Sullivan, R. J., Harding, J. J., D'Angelo, S., Dickson, M., Schwartz, G. K., Chapman, P. B., Wolchok, J. D., Hodi, F. S., & Carvajal, R. D. (2013). Clinical activity of ipilimumab for metastatic uveal melanoma: A retrospective review of the Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center, and University Hospital of Lausanne experience. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28282
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.