The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Highly accurate diagnosis of cancer in thyroid nodules with follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm cytology by ThyroSeq v2 next‐generation sequencing assay
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is a common approach to evaluating thyroid nodules, although 20% to 30% of FNAs have indeterminate cytology, which hampers the appropriate management of these patients. Follicular (or oncocytic) neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular (or oncocytic) neoplasm (FN/SFN) is a common indeterminate diagnosis with a cancer risk of approximately 15% to 30%. In this study, the authors tested whether the most complete next‐generation sequencing (NGS) panel of genetic markers could significantly improve cancer diagnosis in these nodules. METHODS: The evaluation of 143 consecutive FNA samples with a cytologic diagnosis of FN/SFN from patients with known surgical outcomes included 91 retrospective samples and 52 prospective samples. Analyses were performed on a proprietary sequencer using the targeted ThyroSeq v2 NGS panel, which simultaneously tests for point mutations in 13 genes and for 42 types of gene fusions that occur in thyroid cancer. The expression of 8 genes was used to assess the cellular composition of FNA samples. RESULTS: In the entire cohort, histologic analysis revealed 104 benign nodules and 39 malignant nodules. The most common point mutations involved the neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog ( NRAS ), followed by the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog ( KRAS ), the telomerase reverse transcriptase ( TERT ) gene, and the thyroid‐stimulating hormone receptor ( TSHR ) gene. The identified fusions involved the thyroid adenoma associated ( THADA ) gene; the peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ ( PPARG ) gene; and the neurotrophic tyrosine kinase, receptor, type 3 ( NTRK3 ) gene. Performance characteristics were similar in the retrospective and prospective groups. Among all FN/SFN nodules, preoperative ThyroSeq v2 performed with 90% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 80%‐99%), 93% specificity (95% CI, 88%‐98%), a positive predictive value of 83% (95% CI, 72%‐95%), a negative predictive value of 96% (95% CI, 92%‐100%), and 92% accuracy (95% CI, 88%‐97%). CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicate that comprehensive genotyping of thyroid nodules using a broad NGS panel provides a highly accurate diagnosis for nodules with FN/SFN cytology and should facilitate the optimal management of these patients. Cancer 2014;120:3627–3634. © 2014 American Cancer Society .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Likelihood ratios with confidence: Sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies
Simel, D. L., Samsa, G. P., & Matchar, D. B. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(91)90128-v · Cited by 932 · cited 1×
“This method involved computing the ratios of the retrospective cohort to the prospective cohort for each of the 4 statistical parameters and then computing the asymptotic 95% confidence interval (CI) for the ratio using the method described by Simel and colleagues.(23) The CIs were computed using the R statistical pac…”
Method
Cited by
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Self-citationRAS mutations in human cancers: Roles in precision medicine
Murugan, A. K., Grieco, M., & Tsuchida, N. (2019) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.06.007 · Cited by 146
Shonka, D. C., Ho, A., Chintakuntlawar, A. V., Geiger, J. L., Park, J. C., Seetharamu, N., Jasim, S., Abdelhamid Ahmed, A. H., Bible, K. C., Brose, M. S., et al. (2022) · Head & Neck · doi:10.1002/hed.27025 · Cited by 117
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nikiforov, Y. E., Carty, S. E., Chiosea, S. I., Coyne, C., Duvvuri, U., Ferris, R. L., Gooding, W. E., Hodak, S. P., LeBeau, S. O., Ohori, N. P., Seethala, R. R., Tublin, M. E., Yip, L., & Nikiforova, M. N.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09-10
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 3627-3634
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1484128005
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 51.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.