Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Polymerase ɛ (POLE) mutations in endometrial cancer: Clinical outcomes and implications for Lynch syndrome testing

Open access
Billingsley, Caroline C., Cohn, David E., Mutch, David G., Stephens, Julie A., Suarez, Adrian A., Goodfellow, Paul J.·2015·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: DNA polymerase ɛ (POLE) exonuclease domain mutations characterize a subtype of endometrial cancer (EC) with a markedly increased somatic mutational burden. POLE‐mutant tumors were described as a molecular subtype with improved progression‐free survival by The Cancer Genome Atlas. In this study, the frequency, spectrum, prognostic significance, and potential clinical application of POLE mutations were investigated in patients with endometrioid EC. METHODS: Polymerase chain reaction amplification and Sanger sequencing were used to test for POLE mutations in 544 tumors. Correlations between demographic, survival, clinicopathologic, and molecular features were investigated. Statistical tests were 2‐sided. RESULTS: Thirty POLE mutations (5.6%) were identified. Mutations were associated with younger age (<60 years; P=.001). POLE mutations were detected in tumors with microsatellite stability (MSS) and microsatellite instability (MSI) at similar frequencies (5.9% and 5.2%, respectively) and were most common in tumors with MSI that lacked mutL homolog 1 (MLH1) methylation (P<.001). There was no association with progression‐free survival (hazard ratio, 0.22; P=.127). CONCLUSIONS: The discovery that mutations occur with equal frequency in MSS and MSI tumors and are most frequent in MSI tumors lacking MLH1 methylation has implications for Lynch syndrome screening and mutation testing. The current results indicate that POLE mutations are associated with somatic mutation in DNA mismatch repair genes in a subset of tumors. The absence of an association between POLE mutation and progression‐free survival indicates that POLE mutation status is unlikely to be a clinically useful prognostic marker. However, POLE testing in MSI ECs could serve as a marker of somatic disease origin. Therefore, POLE tumor testing may be a valuable exclusionary criterion for Lynch syndrome gene testing. Cancer 2015;121:386–394. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.29046

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Billingsley, C. C., Cohn, D. E., Mutch, D. G., Stephens, J. A., Suarez, A. A., & Goodfellow, P. J.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-15
Volume
121
Issue
3
Pages
386-394
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W1630303999
Cited by
176
References
3
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polymerase ɛ (POLE) mutations in endometrial cancer: Clinical outcomes and implications for Lynch syndrome testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.29046
The paper
Billingsley, C. C., Cohn, D. E., Mutch, D. G., Stephens, J. A., Suarez, A. A., & Goodfellow, P. J. (2015). Polymerase ɛ (POLE) mutations in endometrial cancer: Clinical outcomes and implications for Lynch syndrome testing. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.