Cited by 104

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Epidemiology of meningiomas post-Public Law 107–206: The Benign Brain Tumor Cancer Registries Amendment Act

Dolecek, Therese A., Dressler, Emily Van Meter, Thakkar, Jigisha P., Liu, Meng, Al‐Qaisi, Abeer, Villano, John L.·2015·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current analysis follows the implementation of Public Law 107‐260, the Benign Brain Tumor Cancer Registries Amendment Act, which mandated the collection of nonmalignant brain tumors. METHODS: Meningiomas were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database for the years 2004 to 2011. Demographic and clinical characteristics, initial treatment patterns, and survival outcomes were evaluated using surveillance epidemiology statistical methods. RESULTS: The average annual age‐adjusted incidence rate per 100,000 population was 7.62 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 7.55‐7.68) for all meningiomas, 7.18 (95% CI, 7.12‐7.25) for benign meningiomas, 0.32 (95% CI, 0.31‐0.33) for borderline malignant meningiomas, and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.11‐0.12) for malignant meningiomas. The annual rates increased for benign and borderline malignant tumors but decreased for malignant tumors. The rates for women exceeded those for men, especially for those with benign meningiomas. Black race was associated with significantly higher rates as was advancing age. Greater than 80% of tumors were located in cerebral meninges. Diagnostic confirmation through pathology occurred for approximately 50% of benign tumors, 90% of borderline malignant tumors, and 80% of malignant tumors. No initial treatment was reported for greater than 60% of benign tumors, 29% of borderline malignant tumors, or 31% of malignant tumors. The 5‐year relative survival estimates for benign tumors, borderline malignant tumors, and malignant tumors were 85.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85%‐86.2%), 82.3% (95% CI, 79.3%‐84.8%), and 66% (95% CI, 60.6%‐70.9%), respectively. Predictors of poorer survival were advanced age, being male gender, black race, no initial treatment, and malignant tumor behavior. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis demonstrates that there is an increasing incidence of nonmalignant meningiomas, probably because of reporting learning curves associated with the implementation of Public Law 107‐260. The high proportion of cases who receive no initial treatment is a survival outcome concern, especially for patients with malignant meningiomas. Cancer 2015;121:2400–2410. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.29379

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/00000478-199712000-00008 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/neuonc/not151 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/0090-3019(87)90005-X · DOI
  5. 10.3171/jns.2000.92.5.0766 · DOI
  6. 10.1056/NEJMoa070972 · DOI
  7. 10.3171/jns.2006.105.4.538 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/1097-0142(19920915)70:6<1568::AID-CNCR2820700621>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0090-3019(86)90233-8 · DOI
  10. 10.3171/jns.1985.62.1.0018 · DOI
  11. 10.1136/jnnp.20.1.22 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0360-3016(97)00317-9 · DOI
  13. 10.3171/jns.1994.80.2.0195 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/s11910-009-0034-5 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990501)85:9<2046::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  16. 10.2214/ajr.123.3.453 · DOI
  17. Fritz A, 2000, International Classification of Diseases for Oncology
  18. The North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR), 2011, Race and Ethnicity Work Group. NAACCR Guideline for Enhancing Hispanic/Latino Identification: Revised NAACCR Hispanic/Latino Identification Algorithm (NHIA v2.2.1)
  19. 10.1177/0962280206070621 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<335::AID-SIM336>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  21. IBM Corporation, 2012, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 21.0 [software package]
  22. 10.1002/9780470258019 · DOI
  23. McCarthy BJ, 2013, The impact of the Benign Brain Tumor Cancer Registries Amendment Act (Public Law 107‐260) on non‐malignant brain and central nervous system tumor incidence trends, J Registry Manag, 40, 32
  24. 10.3171/FOC-07/10/E2 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/1097-0142(19930801)72:3<639::AID-CNCR2820720304>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
  26. Preston‐Martin S, 1989, Risk factors for gliomas and meningiomas in males in Los Angeles County, Cancer Res, 49, 6137
  27. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604438 · DOI
  28. 10.3171/2011.3.JNS101748 · DOI
  29. 10.3171/jns.1998.88.5.0831 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0090-3019(86)90259-4 · DOI
  31. 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822d408a · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 104

Metadata

Authors
Dolecek, T. A., Dressler, E. V. M., Thakkar, J. P., Liu, M., Al‐Qaisi, A., & Villano, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Institute for Health Research and Policy School of Public Health University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois
  • Division of Cancer Biostatistics University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky
  • Department of Medicine University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-04-14
Volume
121
Issue
14
Pages
2400-2410
ISSN
  • 0008-543X
  • 1097-0142
Cited by
104
References
0
Language
en
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R03CA15 6561)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of meningiomas post-Public Law 107–206: The Benign Brain Tumor Cancer Registries Amendment Act. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.29379
The paper
Dolecek, T. A., Dressler, E. V. M., Thakkar, J. P., Liu, M., Al‐Qaisi, A., & Villano, J. L. (2015). Epidemiology of meningiomas post-Public Law 107–206: The Benign Brain Tumor Cancer Registries Amendment Act. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29379