Employment and income losses among cancer survivors: estimates from a national longitudinal survey of American families
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Cancer presents a substantial hardship for patients and their families in multiple domains beyond health and survival. Relatively little is known about the economic impact of cancer. The authors present estimates of the aggregate effects of a cancer diagnosis on employment and income in a prospective, nationally representative sample of US adults. METHODS: The authors used data from the 1990 through 2009 waves of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, a nationally representative, prospective, population-based observational study with high-quality individual and family-level economic information. Age-adjusted, sex-stratified, individual fixed-effects regression models were used to derive estimates of the impact of cancer on employment, hours worked, individual income, and total family income. RESULTS: Significant effects of cancer on all 4 outcomes were observed. The probability of a cancer patient being employed dropped by almost 10 percentage points, and hours worked declined by up to 200 hours in the first year after diagnosis. Annual labor-market earnings dropped almost 40% within 2 years after diagnosis and remained low, whereas total family income declined by 20%, although it recovered within 4 years after the diagnosis. These economic impacts on survivors were driven by effects among men; the effects among women largely were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: A cancer diagnosis has substantial effects on the economic well-being of affected adults and their families. With the increasing number of cancer survivors in the US population, there is a growing need for examining the long-term implications for economic well-being and ways to mitigate the economic hardship associated with cancer.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People affected by cancer commonly experience poor psychological well-being and poor quality of life.
“People affected by cancer (PABC) commonly experience poor psychological well-being and poor quality of life (QoL).3–5”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 117
- Authors
- Zajacova, A., Dowd, J. B., Schoeni, R. F., & Wallace, R. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Wyoming (US)
- City University of New York (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zajacova, Anna
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10-26
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 4425-4432
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- PMC
- PMC4670608
- OpenAlex
- W2105037241
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 21.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (AG012846, T32AG000221, P30AG012846)
- National Cancer Institute (R03CA149072)
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD041028)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD041028, P2CHD041028, R01HD069609)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- cancer survivors, job loss, income loss, economic burden of cancer, working hours, household income, labor income, sex differences, economic hardship, Panel Study of Income Dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Employment, Female, Humans, Income, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, United States, Case-Control Studies, Cost of Illness, Survivors, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review