The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The incidence of fatal breast cancer measures the increased effectiveness of therapy in women participating in mammography screening
Open accessAbstract
Background: Women and their health care providers need a reliable answer to this important question: If a woman chooses to participate in regular mammography screening, then how much will this choice improve her chances of avoiding a death from breast cancer compared with women who choose not to participate? Methods: To answer this question, we used comprehensive registries for population, screening history, breast cancer incidence, and disease‐specific death data in a defined population in Dalarna County, Sweden. The annual incidence of breast cancer was calculated along with the annual incidence of breast cancers that were fatal within 10 and within 11 to 20 years of diagnosis among women aged 40 to 69 years who either did or did not participate in mammography screening during a 39‐year period (1977‐2015). For an additional comparison, corresponding data are presented from 19 years of the prescreening period (1958‐1976). All patients received stage‐specific therapy according to the latest national guidelines, irrespective of the mode of detection. Results: The benefit for women who chose to participate in an organized breast cancer screening program was a 60% lower risk of dying from breast cancer within 10 years after diagnosis (relative risk, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.34‐0.48) and a 47% lower risk of dying from breast cancer within 20 years after diagnosis (relative risk, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.44‐0.63) compared with the corresponding risks for nonparticipants. Conclusions: Although all patients with breast cancer stand to benefit from advances in breast cancer therapy, the current results demonstrate that women who have participated in mammography screening obtain a significantly greater benefit from the therapy available at the time of diagnosis than do those who have not participated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Screening Mammography — A Long Run for a Short Slide?
Welch, H. G. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejme1008369 · Cited by 113
Cited by
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21660 · Cited by 108,699
Mammography screening reduces rates of advanced and fatal breast cancers: Results in 549,091 women
Duffy, S. W., Tabár, L., Yen, A. M., Dean, P. B., Smith, R. A., Jonsson, H., Törnberg, S., Chen, S. L., Chiu, S. Y., Fann, J. C., et al. (2020) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.32859 · Cited by 412
Self-citationPhilipo, G. S., Vuhahula, E., Kimambo, A., Mmbaga, E. J., Van Loon, K., & Ng, D. L. (2021) · JCO Global Oncology · doi:10.1200/go.20.00279 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Tabár, L., Dean, P. B., Chen, T. H., Yen, A. M., Chen, S. L., Fann, J. C., Chiu, S. Y., Ku, M. M., Wu, W. Y., Hsu, C., Chen, Y., Beckmann, K., Smith, R. A., & Duffy, S. W.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-11-08
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 515-523
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2900053041
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The incidence of fatal breast cancer measures the increased effectiveness of therapy in women participating in mammography screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.31840
- The paper
- Tabár, L., Dean, P. B., Chen, T. H., Yen, A. M., Chen, S. L., Fann, J. C., Chiu, S. Y., Ku, M. M., Wu, W. Y., Hsu, C., Chen, Y., Beckmann, K., Smith, R. A., & Duffy, S. W. (2019). The incidence of fatal breast cancer measures the increased effectiveness of therapy in women participating in mammography screening. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31840
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.