A randomized controlled trial of a wearable technology‐based intervention for increasing moderate to vigorous physical activity and reducing sedentary behavior in breast cancer survivors: The ACTIVATE Trial
Open accessAbstract
Background: The benefits of an active lifestyle after a breast cancer diagnosis are well recognized, but the majority of survivors are insufficiently active. The ACTIVATE Trial examined the efficacy of an intervention (use of the Garmin Vivofit 2 activity monitor coupled with a behavioral feedback and goal‐setting session and 5 telephone‐delivered health coaching sessions) to increase moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and reduce sedentary behavior in breast cancer survivors. Methods: This randomized controlled trial recruited 83 inactive, postmenopausal women diagnosed with stage I‐III breast cancer who had completed primary treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group or to the control group, and the intervention was delivered over a 12‐week period. MVPA and sedentary behavior were measured with Actigraph and activPAL accelerometers at baseline (T1) and at the end of the intervention (T2). Results: Retention in the trial was high, with 80 (96%) of participants completing T2 data collection. At T2, there was a significant between‐group difference in MVPA (69 min/wk; 95% CI = 22‐116) favoring the intervention group. The trial resulted in a statistically significant decrease in both total sitting time and prolonged bouts (≥20 min) of sitting, with between‐group reductions of 37 min/d (95% CI = −72 to −2) and 42 min/d (95% CI = −83 to −2), respectively, favoring the intervention group. Conclusion: Results from the ACTIVATE Trial suggest that the use of wearable technology presents an inexpensive and scalable opportunity to facilitate more active lifestyles for cancer survivors. Whether or not such wearable technology‐based interventions can create sustainable behavioral change should be the subject of future research.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reducing sedentary time with frequent breaks is safe in other chronic health conditions and applicable to patients with cardiometabolic diseases.
“Others have shown that reducing sedentary time with frequent breaks is safe in other chronic health conditions and applicable to patients with cardiometabolic diseases [15-17].”
From Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of a “Sit Less” Program Leveraging Fitbit Tracking and Tailored Text Messages in Cardiometabolic Disease: Findings From 2 Parallel Randomized Controlled Trials in Coronary Artery Disease and Type 2 Diabetes (2026) · cites this paper as [17]
The Results report no adverse events in the ACTIVATE Trial, and the results table reports reduced total and prolonged sitting time. However, the trial studied breast cancer survivors, not patients with cardiometabolic diseases, and it did not establish that frequent breaks were safe or effective in that population. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 171
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE, et al. Sedentary time and its independent risk on disease incidence, mortality and hospitalization in adults: a meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine 2015;162(2): 123-32.
- Authors
- Lynch, B. M., Nguyen, N. H., Moore, M. M., Reeves, M. M., Rosenberg, D. E., Boyle, T., Vallance, J. K., Milton, S., Friedenreich, C. M., & English, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
- Cancer Council Victoria (AU)
- St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Athabasca University (CA)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Alberta Health Services (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lynch, Brigid M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04-23
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2846-2855
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W2942129951
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 7.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Breast Cancer Foundation (ECF-15-012)
- Canada Research Chairs
- World Cancer Research Fund (2015/1397)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1072266)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Keywords
- breast cancer survivors, wearable devices, wearable activity trackers, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, sedentary behavior, sitting time, health coaching, behavioral feedback, goal setting, postmenopausal women, physical activity promotion, accelerometer-measured activity
- MeSH terms
- Cancer Survivors, Wearable Electronic Devices, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Life Style, Middle Aged, Telephone, Exercise, Exercise Movement Techniques, Sedentary Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review