The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk‐reducing surgery in unaffected individuals receiving cancer genetic testing in an integrated health care system
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Germline genetic testing enables primary cancer prevention, including through prophylactic surgery. We examined risk-reducing surgeries in unaffected individuals tested for hereditary cancer susceptibly between 2010 and 2018 in the Kaiser Permanente Northwest health system. METHODS: We used an internal genetic testing database to create a cohort of individuals who received tests including one or more high-penetrance hereditary cancer susceptibility gene. We then identified, after testing, bilateral mastectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), and total hysterectomy procedures in electronic health record and claims data through 2019. We describe surgery utilization by genetic test results and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. RESULTS: The cohort included 1020 individuals, 16% with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in one or more of the following genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, APC, MUTYH, ATM, MSH2, PALB2, BRIP1, MLH1, MSH6, EPCAM, FLCN, RAD51C, RAD51D, or TP53. Among individuals with P/LP variants making them candidates for mastectomy, BSO, or hysterectomy per NCCN guidelines, 34% (33/97), 24% (23/94), and 8% (1/12), respectively, underwent surgery during follow-up. Fifty-three percent (18/37) of hysterectomies were among APC, BRCA1, and BRCA2 P/LP variant heterozygotes, typically concurrent with BSO. Three individuals with variants of uncertain significance (only) and 22 with negative results had prophylactic surgery after genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of risk-reducing surgery following usual care genetic testing appears to be lower than in studies that actively recruit high-risk patients and provide testing and follow-up care in specialized settings. Factors in addition to genetic test results and NCCN guidelines motivate prophylactic surgery use and deserve further study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ludwig, K. K., Neuner, J., Butler, A., Geurts, J. L., & Kong, A. L. (2016) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.06.010 · Cited by 243
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1001/jama.2019.10987 · DOI
- WeissJM GuptaS BurkeCA et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: genetic/familial high‐risk assessment: colorectal version 1.2021. Accessed June 3 2022.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31487681/
- 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.2010.1237 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMoa052627 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1465 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00006 · DOI
- 10.3390/cancers12071874 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.23554 · DOI
- Jeffers L, 2019, Interventions to improve psychosocial well‐being in female BRCA‐mutation carriers following risk‐reducing surgery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 10, CD012894
- 10.1007/s10689-017-9997-6 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10549-014-3134-0 · DOI
- 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107356 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0045 · DOI
- 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0128 · DOI
- 10.1245/s10434-017-5959-3 · DOI
- Eleje GU, 2018, Risk‐reducing bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 8, CD012464
- Sengupta S, 2019, Data quality assessment and multi‐organizational reporting: tools to enhance network knowledge, EGEMS (Wash DC)., 7, 8
- 10.1007/s10552-016-0808-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.022 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.031 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13053-019-0130-8 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.9403 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.33668 · DOI
- 10.1111/tbj.12521 · DOI
- 10.1002/cncr.26294 · DOI
- 10.1200/OP.20.00256 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abdel-Razeq, H., & Mansour, R. (2026) · World Journal of Oncology · doi:10.14740/wjon2692
Metadata
- Authors
- Knerr, S., Guo, B., Mittendorf, K. F., Feigelson, H. S., Gilmore, M. J., Jarvik, G. P., Kauffman, T. L., Keast, E., Lynch, F. L., Muessig, K. R., Okuyama, S., Veenstra, D. L., Zepp, J. M., Goddard, K. A. B., & Devine, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Kaiser Permanente (US)
- Denver Health Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Knerr, Sarah
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-06-09
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 3090-3098
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- PMC
- PMC9308746
- OpenAlex
- W4282922692
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cancer (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Human Genome Research Institute (U24HG007307, U01HG007292)
- National Cancer Institute
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- Kaiser Permanente
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
- Keywords
- prophylactic surgery, hereditary cancer predisposition, germline genetic testing, bilateral mastectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, NCCN guidelines, BRCA1, BRCA2, APC, variants of uncertain significance, surgical uptake, integrated care
- MeSH terms
- Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Mastectomy, Germ-Line Mutation, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review