Cited by 9BRCA gene mutations in cancerGenetic factors in colorectal cancerMultiple and Secondary Primary Cancers

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Risk‐reducing surgery in unaffected individuals receiving cancer genetic testing in an integrated health care system

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Germline genetic testing enables primary cancer prevention, including through prophylactic surgery. We examined risk-reducing surgeries in unaffected individuals tested for hereditary cancer susceptibly between 2010 and 2018 in the Kaiser Permanente Northwest health system. METHODS: We used an internal genetic testing database to create a cohort of individuals who received tests including one or more high-penetrance hereditary cancer susceptibility gene. We then identified, after testing, bilateral mastectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO), and total hysterectomy procedures in electronic health record and claims data through 2019. We describe surgery utilization by genetic test results and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. RESULTS: The cohort included 1020 individuals, 16% with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in one or more of the following genes: BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, APC, MUTYH, ATM, MSH2, PALB2, BRIP1, MLH1, MSH6, EPCAM, FLCN, RAD51C, RAD51D, or TP53. Among individuals with P/LP variants making them candidates for mastectomy, BSO, or hysterectomy per NCCN guidelines, 34% (33/97), 24% (23/94), and 8% (1/12), respectively, underwent surgery during follow-up. Fifty-three percent (18/37) of hysterectomies were among APC, BRCA1, and BRCA2 P/LP variant heterozygotes, typically concurrent with BSO. Three individuals with variants of uncertain significance (only) and 22 with negative results had prophylactic surgery after genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of risk-reducing surgery following usual care genetic testing appears to be lower than in studies that actively recruit high-risk patients and provide testing and follow-up care in specialized settings. Factors in addition to genetic test results and NCCN guidelines motivate prophylactic surgery use and deserve further study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.34349

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1001/jama.2019.10987 · DOI
  2. WeissJM GuptaS BurkeCA et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: genetic/familial high‐risk assessment: colorectal version 1.2021. Accessed June 3 2022.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31487681/
  3. 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001 · DOI
  4. 10.1001/jama.2010.1237 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1056/NEJMoa052627 · DOI
  6. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1465 · DOI
  7. 10.7326/0003-4819-144-6-200603210-00006 · DOI
  8. 10.3390/cancers12071874 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/cncr.23554 · DOI
  10. Jeffers L, 2019, Interventions to improve psychosocial well‐being in female BRCA‐mutation carriers following risk‐reducing surgery, Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 10, CD012894
  11. 10.1007/s10689-017-9997-6 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s10549-014-3134-0 · DOI
  13. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107356 · DOI
  14. 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.0045 · DOI
  15. 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0128 · DOI
  16. 10.1245/s10434-017-5959-3 · DOI
  17. Eleje GU, 2018, Risk‐reducing bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 8, CD012464
  18. Sengupta S, 2019, Data quality assessment and multi‐organizational reporting: tools to enhance network knowledge, EGEMS (Wash DC)., 7, 8
  19. 10.1007/s10552-016-0808-4 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.022 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.031 · DOI
  22. 10.1186/s13053-019-0130-8 · DOI
  23. 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.9403 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/cncr.33668 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/tbj.12521 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/cncr.26294 · DOI
  27. 10.1200/OP.20.00256 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Knerr, S., Guo, B., Mittendorf, K. F., Feigelson, H. S., Gilmore, M. J., Jarvik, G. P., Kauffman, T. L., Keast, E., Lynch, F. L., Muessig, K. R., Okuyama, S., Veenstra, D. L., Zepp, J. M., Goddard, K. A. B., & Devine, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Denver Health Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Knerr, Sarah
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-06-09
Volume
128
Issue
16
Pages
3090-3098
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W4282922692
Cited by
9
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U24HG007307, U01HG007292)
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • Kaiser Permanente
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
Keywords
prophylactic surgery, hereditary cancer predisposition, germline genetic testing, bilateral mastectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, NCCN guidelines, BRCA1, BRCA2, APC, variants of uncertain significance, surgical uptake, integrated care
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Mastectomy, Germ-Line Mutation, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review