Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Age‐related decreases in Nurr1 immunoreactivity in the human substantia nigra

Chu, Yaping, Kompoliti, Katie, Cochran, Elizabeth J., Mufson, Elliott J., Kordower, Jeffrey H.·2002·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Nuclear receptor‐related factor 1 (Nurr1), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, is associated with the induction of dopaminergic (DA) phenotypes in developing and mature midbrain neurons. It is well established that dopaminergic nigrostriatal function decreases with age. Whether age‐related deficits in DA phenotypic markers are associated with alterations in Nurr1 expression is unknown. The present study found that virtually all of tyrosine hydroxylase‐immunoreactive (TH‐ir) neurons within the young adult human substantia nigra were Nurr1‐immunoreactive (Nurr1‐ir) positive. Stereologic counts revealed a significant reduction in the number of Nurr1‐ir nigral neurons in middle‐aged (23.13%) and aged (46.33%) individuals relative to young subjects. The loss of Nurr1‐ir neurons was associated with a similar decline in TH‐ir neuron number. In this regard, TH‐ir neuronal number was decreased in middle‐aged (11.10%) and in aged (45.97%) subjects, and this loss of TH‐ir neurons was highly correlated (r = 0.92) with the loss of Nurr1‐ir neurons. In contrast, the number of melanin‐containing nigral neuron number was generally stable across age groups, indicating that changes in Nurr1 and TH reflect phenotypic age‐related changes and not frank neuronal degeneration. In support of this concept, confocal microscopic analyses of Nurr1‐ir and TH‐ir fluorescence intensity revealed parallel decreases in Nurr1‐ and TH‐immunofluorescence as a function of age. These data demonstrate that age‐related decline of DA phenotypic markers is associated with down‐regulation of Nurr1 expression in the SN. J. Comp. Neurol. 450:203–214, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.10261

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Chu, Y., Kompoliti, K., Cochran, E. J., Mufson, E. J., & Kordower, J. H.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-07-18
Volume
450
Issue
3
Pages
203-214
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2088514983
Cited by
199
References
2
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age‐related decreases in Nurr1 immunoreactivity in the human substantia nigra. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.10261
The paper
Chu, Y., Kompoliti, K., Cochran, E. J., Mufson, E. J., & Kordower, J. H. (2002). Age‐related decreases in Nurr1 immunoreactivity in the human substantia nigra. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10261

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.