Dopamine transporter immunoreactivity in monkey cerebral cortex: regional, laminar, and ultrastructural localization
Abstract
Dopamine (DA) influences a number of cognitive and motor functions that are mediated by the primate cerebral cortex, and the DA membrane transporter (DAT) is known to be a critical regulator of DA neurotransmission in subcortical structures in rodents. To gain insight into the possible functional role of cortical DAT, we compared the regional, laminar, and ultrastructural distribution of DAT immunoreactivity to that of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), the rate-limiting enzyme in DA synthesis, in the cerebral cortex of macaque monkeys. DAT-immunoreactive (DAT-IR) axons were present throughout the cortical mantle, with substantial differences in density and laminar distribution across cytoarchitectonic areas. In particular, high densities of DAT-IR axons were present in certain regions (e.g., posterior parietal cortex, dentate gyrus) not previously thought to receive a substantial DA input. The laminar distribution of DAT-IR axons ranged from a restricted localization of labeled axons to layer 1 in lightly innervated regions to the presence of axons in all six cortical layers, with a particularly dense plexus in deep layer 3, in highly innervated regions. These regional and laminar patterns paralleled those of TH-IR axons, but several differences in fiber morphology and ultrastructural localization of DAT were observed. For example, in contrast to TH, DAT immunoreactivity in the cortex was localized predominantly to small-diameter profiles, whereas, in the dorsolateral caudate nucleus, DAT and TH immunoreactivities were present in both large-diameter and small-diameter profiles, which may represent varicose and intervaricose axon segments, respectively. Overall, the distribution of DAT-IR axons confirms and extends the results of previous reports, using other markers of DA axons, that the DA innervation of the primate cerebral cortex is global but specialized on both a regional basis and a laminar basis. In particular, these observations reveal an anatomical substrate for a direct and potent influence of DA over neuronal activity in posterior parietal cortex and in certain regions of the temporal lobe. However, due to its predominant distribution to small-diameter profiles, immunoreactivity for DAT may not be an appropriate ultrastructural marker for larger DA varicosities in the primate cortex. Moreover, this distribution of DAT suggests that cortical DA fibers may permit greater neurotransmitter diffusion than subcortical DA axons.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many if not all regions of the interoceptive circuit are characterized by a high density of dopaminergic receptors and terminals across all cortical layers, particularly visceromotor regions like AIC, ACC, or OFC.
“Notably, many if not all regions of the interoceptive circuit in Figure 7, are characterized by a high density of dopaminergic receptors and terminals across all cortical layers; this is particularly well-established for visceromotor regions like AIC, ACC, or OFC (Gaspar et al., 1989; Hurd et al., 2001; Lewis et al., 2001).”
From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as Lewis et al., 2001
DAT1 is mainly expressed in the striatum, with the highest density in the caudate nucleus.
“DAT1 is mainly expressed in the striatum, with the highest density in the caudate nucleus.31”
From Striatal sensitivity during reward processing in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (2012) · cites this paper as [31]
DAT1 and COMT are responsible for the bulk of dopamine degradation in the striatum and prefrontal cortex respectively.
“which are responsible for the bulk of dopamine degradation in the striatum and the prefrontal cortex respectively”
From DAT1 and COMT effects on delay discounting and trait impulsivity in male adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and healthy controls (2010) · cites this paper as Lewis et al, 2001
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 91 · Cited by 352
- Authors
- Lewis, D. A., Melchitzky, D. S., Sesack, S. R., Whitehead, R. E., Auh, S., & Sampson, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lewis, David A.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-02-23
- Volume
- 432
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-136
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2044546476
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH43784, MH 45156, MH 50314, P50MH045156)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- dopamine transporter, macaque, tyrosine hydroxylase, cortical laminar distribution, axon ultrastructure, posterior parietal cortex, dentate gyrus, caudate nucleus, dopamine signaling, neurotransmitter diffusion
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Axons, Carrier Proteins, Cerebral Cortex, Frontal Lobe, Immunohistochemistry, Macaca fascicularis, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Microscopy, Electron, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Occipital Lobe, Organ Specificity, Parietal Lobe, Temporal Lobe, Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase, Microscopy, Immunoelectron, Membrane Transport Proteins, Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review