Cited by 297Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Synaptic structural abnormalities in the Ts65Dn mouse model of down syndrome

Belichenko, Pavel V., Masliah, Eliezer, Kleschevnikov, Alexander M., Villar, Angela J., Epstein, Charles J., Salehi, Ahmad, Mobley, William C.·2004·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The Ts65Dn mouse is a genetic model for Down syndrome. Although this mouse shows abnormalities in cognitive function that implicate hippocampus as well as marked deficits in hippocampal long-term potentiation, the structure of the hippocampus has been little studied. We characterized synaptic structure in Ts65Dn and control (2N) mice, studying the hippocampus (fascia dentata, CA1) as well as the motor and somatosensory cortex, entorhinal cortex, and medial septum. Confocal microscopy was used to examine immunostained presynaptic boutons and to detail the structure of dendrites after Lucifer yellow microinjection. Both presynaptic and postsynaptic elements were significantly enlarged in Ts65Dn in all regions examined. The changes were detected at the youngest age examined (postnatal day 21) and in adults. In studies detailing the changes in fascia dentata and motor cortex, the enlargement of spines affected the entire population, resulting in the presence of spines whose volume was greatly increased. Electron microscopy confirmed that boutons and spines were enlarged and demonstrated abnormalities in the internal membranes of both. In addition, spine density was decreased on the dendrites of dentate granule cells, and there was reorganization of inhibitory inputs, with a relative decrease in inputs to dendrite shafts and an increase in inputs to the necks of spines. Taken together, the findings document widespread abnormalities of synaptic structure that recapitulate important…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.20337

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ts65Dn mice exhibit deficient neurological structural phenotypes in brain regions where the current study found DYRK1A overexpression, including during perinatal or early postnatal ages.

    “Ts65Dn mice do exhibit deficient neurological structural phenotypes in brain regions where we found DYRK1A overexpression including during perinatal or early postnatal ages (Baxter et al., 2000; Belichenko et al., 2004; Bianchi et al., 2010; Chakrabarti et al., 2007; Roper et al., 2006b; Stagni et al., 2016).”
  • The length of symmetric synapses appears to be significantly longer in the Ts65Dn hippocampus indicating an alteration of structure of typically inhibitory connections.

    “Additionally, the length of symmetric synapses appears to be significantly longer in the Ts65Dn hippocampus indicating an alteration of structure of typically inhibitory connections.”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Belichenko et al., 2004

  • Though Ts65Dn fails to capture the majority of the volumetric changes observed in humans, they do appear to recapitulate the synaptic changes as decreases in synaptic density have been identified in both the hippocampus and the neocortex.

    “Though Ts65Dn fails to capture the majority of the volumetric changes observed in humans, they do appear to recapitulate the synaptic changes as decreases in synaptic density have been identified in both the hippocampus and the neocortex (Belichenko et al., 2004; Chakrabarti et al., 2007).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Belichenko et al., 2004

  • Close examination has found that both pre-synaptic boutons and spines are enlarged and the physical distribution of afferent inputs is changed compared to their euploid controls in Ts65Dn.

    “Close examination has found that both pre-synaptic boutons and spines are enlarged and the physical distribution of afferent inputs is changed compared to their euploid controls (Belichenko et al., 2004).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Belichenko et al., 2004

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 80 · Cited by 297

Authors
Belichenko, P. V., Masliah, E., Kleschevnikov, A. M., Villar, A. J., Epstein, C. J., Salehi, A., & Mobley, W. C.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Belichenko, Pavel V.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10-28
Volume
480
Issue
3
Pages
281-298
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W1996154142
Cited by
297
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 21
FWCI
15.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd031498-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG016999, AG 16999)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 38869, R01NS038869)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-31498)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
Ts65Dn mouse model, Down syndrome, synaptic structure, dendritic spines, presynaptic terminals, hippocampus, dentate gyrus, CA1, motor cortex, somatosensory cortex, entorhinal cortex, medial septum, dendritic spine density, long-term potentiation
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Down Syndrome, Female, Hippocampus, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Neurologic Mutants, Motor Cortex, Reference Values, Somatosensory Cortex, Synapses, Presynaptic Terminals, Dendritic Spines, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review