Redefining the boundaries of the hippocampal CA2 subfield in the mouse using gene expression and 3‐dimensional reconstruction
Abstract
The morphology of neurons in the main divisions of the hippocampal complex allow the easy identification of granule cells in the dentate gyrus and pyramidal cells in the CA1 and CA3 regions of Ammon's horn. However, neurons in the CA2 subfield have been much more difficult to reliably identify. We have recently identified a set of genes whose expression is restricted to either the dentate gyrus, CA1, CA2, or CA3. Here we show that these genes have an essentially nonoverlapping distribution throughout the entire septotemporal extent of the hippocampus. 3‐Dimensional reconstruction of serial sections processed for in situ hybridization of mannosidase 1, alpha (CA1), bcl‐2‐related ovarian killer protein (CA3), and Purkinje cell protein 4 (dentate gyrus + CA2) was used to define the boundaries of each subregion throughout the entire hippocampus. The boundaries observed for these three genes are recapitulated across a much larger set of genes similarly enriched in specific hippocampal subregions. The extent of CA2 defined on the basis of gene expression is somewhat larger than that previously described on the basis of structural anatomical criteria, particularly at the rostral pole of the hippocampus. These results indicate that, at least at the molecular level, there are robust, consistent genetic boundaries between hippocampal subregions CA1, CA2, CA3, and the dentate gyrus, allowing a redefinition of their boundaries in order to facilitate functional studies of different neuronal subtypes in the hippocampus. J. Comp. Neurol. 485:1–10, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
YFP expression in the Amigo2-Cre line was selective and robust in CA2 pyramidal neurons throughout dorsal hippocampus.
“We observed selective and robust YFP expression in CA2 PNs throughout dorsal hippocampus9-11”
From The hippocampal CA2 region is essential for social memory (2014) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 158
- Authors
- Lein, E. S., Callaway, E. M., Albright, T. D., & Gage, F. H.
- Affiliations
- Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gage, Fred H.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-17
- Volume
- 485
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W1984915263
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Incyte
- National Institute on Aging (AG-06088, R01AG006088)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH063912)
- National Eye Institute (EY14103, R01EY014103)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- gene expression, dentate gyrus, CA1, CA3, 3D reconstruction, in situ hybridization, mouse hippocampus
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain Mapping, Hippocampus, Male, Mannosidases, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Gene Expression, In Situ Hybridization, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review