A novel model of retinal ablation demonstrates that the extent of rod cell death regulates the origin of the regenerated zebrafish rod photoreceptors
Open accessAbstract
The adult zebrafish retina continuously produces rod photoreceptors from infrequent Müller glial cell division, yielding neuronal progenitor cells that migrate to the outer nuclear layer and become rod precursor cells that are committed to differentiate into rods. Retinal damage models suggested that rod cell death induces regeneration from rod precursor cells, whereas loss of any other retinal neurons activates Müller glia proliferation to produce pluripotent neuronal progenitors that can generate any other neuronal cell type in the retina. We tested this hypothesis by creating two transgenic lines that expressed the E. coli nitroreductase enzyme fused to EGFP (NTR‐EGFP) in only rods. Treating transgenic adults with metronidazole resulted in two rod cell death models. First, killing all rods throughout the Tg(zop:nfsB‐EGFP)nt19 retina induced robust Müller glial proliferation, which yielded clusters of neuronal progenitor cells. In contrast, ablating only a subset of rods across the Tg(zop:nfsB‐EGFP)nt20 retina led to rod precursor, but not Müller glial, cell proliferation. We propose that two different criteria determine whether rod cell death will induce a regenerative response from the Müller glia rather than from the resident rod precursor cells in the ONL. First, there must be a large amount of rod cell death to initiate Müller glia proliferation. Second, the rod cell death must be acute, rather than chronic, to stimulate regeneration from the Müller glia. This suggests that the zebrafish retina possesses mechanisms to quantify the amount and timing of rod cell death. J. Comp. Neurol. 518:800–814, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Müller glia mount a regenerative response regardless of whether injury affects only photoreceptors, inner retinal neurons, or all retinal cell types.
“It is interesting that MG elicit a regenerative response regardless if injury affects only photoreceptors, inner retinal neurons or all retinal cell types (Fausett and Goldman, 2006; Fimbel et al., 2007; Montgomery et al., 2010; Vihtelic and Hyde, 2000).”
From Retinal injury, growth factors, and cytokines converge on β-catenin and pStat3 signaling to stimulate retina regeneration (2014) · cites this paper as Montgomery et al., 2010
Müller glia mount a similar response to many different injuries, whether the injuries are restricted to specific cell types or more widespread.
“It is interesting that MG mount a similar response to a variety of injuries regardless if these injuries are restricted to specific cell types or more widespread (Fausett and Goldman, 2006; Fimbel et al., 2007; Montgomery et al., 2010; Vihtelic and Hyde, 2000).”
From Retinal injury, growth factors, and cytokines converge on β-catenin and pStat3 signaling to stimulate retina regeneration (2014) · cites this paper as Montgomery et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 161
- Authors
- Montgomery, J. E., Parsons, M. J., & Hyde, D. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hyde, David R.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01-13
- Volume
- 518
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 800-814
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- PMC
- PMC3656417
- OpenAlex
- W2020607530
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Notre Dame
- National Eye Institute (R21EY017134)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
- Keywords
- Müller cells, zebrafish retina, neural progenitor cells, nitroreductase, metronidazole, retinal ablation, outer nuclear layer
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Metronidazole, Models, Neurological, Nerve Regeneration, Neuroglia, Neurotoxins, Nitroreductases, Retina, Stem Cells, Zebrafish, Cell Death, Apoptosis, Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells, Escherichia coli Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified, Cell Proliferation, Green Fluorescent Proteins, In Vitro Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review