Do all mammals dream?
Open accessAbstract
The presence of dreams in human sleep, especially in REM sleep, and the detection of physiologically similar states in mammals has led many to ponder whether animals experience similar sleep mentation. Recent advances in our understanding of the anatomical and physiological correlates of sleep stages, and thus dreaming, allow a better understanding of the possibility of dream mentation in nonhuman mammals. Here, we explore the potential for dream mentation, in both non‐REM and REM sleep across mammals. If we take a hard‐stance, that dream mentation only occurs during REM sleep, we conclude that it is unlikely that monotremes, cetaceans, and otariid seals while at sea, have the potential to experience dream mentation. Atypical REM sleep in other species, such as African elephants and Arabian oryx, may alter their potential to experience REM dream mentation. Alternatively, evidence that dream mentation occurs during both non‐REM and REM sleep, indicates that all mammals have the potential to experience dream mentation. This non‐REM dream mentation may be different in the species where non‐REM is atypical, such as during unihemispheric sleep in aquatic mammals (cetaceans, sirens, and Otariid seals). In both scenarios, the cetaceans are the least likely mammalian group to experience vivid dream mentation due to the morphophysiological independence of their cerebral hemispheres. The application of techniques revealing dream mentation in humans to other mammals, specifically those that exhibit unusual sleep states, may lead to advances in our understanding of the neural underpinnings of dreams and conscious experiences.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Behavioural and neurological research on dreaming in non-humans raises the possibility that animals are capable of consciously experiencing internally generated mental representations in the form of dreams.
“behavioural and neurological research on dreaming in non-humans raises the possibility that animals are capable of consciously experiencing internally generated mental representations in the form of dreams [116,187–193].”
From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [187]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Freud S (1901). On dreams. (Vol. 5, Standard Edition). London: Hogarth Press, 1952.
- Jouvet M (1962). Recherches sur les structures nerveuses et les mechanismes responsables des differentes phases du sommeil physiologique. Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 100, 125– 206. 14452612
- Lyamin OI, & Siegel JM (2005). Rest and activity states in the hippopotamuses. In Abstract Book of the 33rd Annual Symposium of European Association for Aquatic Mammals (p. 15).
- Sokolov VE, & Mukhametov LM (1982). Electrophysiological study of the sleep on the manatee, Trichechus manatus. Journal of Evolutionary Biochemistry and Physiology, 18, 191– 193.
- Authors
- Manger, P. R., & Siegel, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Manger, Paul R.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-01-29
- Volume
- 528
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3198-3204
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- PMC
- PMC8211436
- OpenAlex
- W3002333533
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation (HL148574)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- dreams, REM sleep, NREM sleep, mammalian sleep, unihemispheric sleep, cetaceans, monotremes, Loxodonta africana, Arabian oryx, sleep stages, consciousness
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dreams, Electroencephalography, Humans, Sleep Stages
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review