Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The tract of Lissauer in relation to sensory transmission in the dorsal horn of spinal cord in the macaque monkey

Denny‐Brown, D., Kirk, E. J., Yanagisawa, N.·1973·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The classical method for study of the area of innervation of skin by one nerve root, isolated by section of three neighboring roots on either side, was used to study the contribution of neighboring segments of spinal cord to transmission at the first sensory synapse. The area from which response to pinscratch could be obtained in the conscious monkey was greatly increased if the spinal cord was sectioned just below the test segment, or hemisected above it, particularly if vascular infarction was avoided. The enlarged area was hypersensitive. The maximal area of skin innervated by any one nerve root was approximately twice as large as had been found by previous investigators. Each sensory point in the ventral parts of dermatomes must be innervated by at least five nerve roots. Work previously reported had shown that the area of test dermatome was reduced by sectioning neighboring roots medial to their ganglia after previous distal section of the same roots, or by section of more than three neighboring roots. These restrictions of area could be reversed by a subconvulsive dose of strychnine. The facilitatory and suppressive effects from neighboring nerve roots and spinal segments respectively were traced to the mechanism of Lissauer's tract, of which the medial division exerts a facilitatory effect and the lateral division a suppressor effect on transmission through the first synapse of the test root. These excitatory and inhibitory effects, thought to be derived from collaterals of nerve fibers of like and unlike function of all sizes entering the substantia gelatinosa of neighboring segments, must be transmitted by small cells with axons in the tract of Lissauer. The reversal of the inhibition by strychnine indicates a post‐synaptic mechanism at the first synapse. The prolongation of either tonic excitatory or tonic inhibitory influence for as long as five days after section of the corresponding input pathway represents a unique feature of the mass polysynaptic effects of the small interneurones making up the substantia gelatinosa, rather than the presence of a long‐lasting transmitter substance. There was evidence that both dorsal root ganglion cells and substantia gelatinosa continue to contribute to fringe effects after isolation from the periphery. The mechanism of the substantia gelatinosa could provide correlation for the type of sequential directional information such as is necessary for the spinal scratch reflex.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901510206

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Denny‐Brown, D., Kirk, E. J., & Yanagisawa, N.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1973-09-15
Volume
151
Issue
2
Pages
175-199
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2113186435
Cited by
162
References
0
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The tract of Lissauer in relation to sensory transmission in the dorsal horn of spinal cord in the macaque monkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901510206
The paper
Denny‐Brown, D., Kirk, E. J., & Yanagisawa, N. (1973). The tract of Lissauer in relation to sensory transmission in the dorsal horn of spinal cord in the macaque monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901510206

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.