The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell death in the development of the lateral motor column of the chick embryo
Abstract
Cell counts were made in the lumbar lateral motor column (l.m.c.) of chick embryos of 5.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 18 days of incubation and five days posthatching (n = equals; 68). Only nuclei with nucleoli were counted and corrections were made for double counting (Abercrombie, 1946). The population attains a peak value of over 20,000 cells (corrected figure: over 17,000) at 5.5–6.5 days = stages 28 and 29 (Hamburger and Hamilton, 1951). The l.m.c. loses between 7,000 and 8,000 cells between days 6.5 and 9.5, (between stages 29 and 36). In other words, 60% of the population survive. A plateau of approximately 12,300 cells (corrected figure: 10,300) is maintained throug five days posthatching. Massive cell degeneration was observed in 7‐ and 8‐day embryos. Counts of distinctly pyknotic cells indicate that at least 5–6% of the total population is in the process of degeneration at any particular time. This figure is probably an underestimation; hence it is virtually certain that the depletion of the l.m.c. is due entirely to cell death. Arguments are presented in support of the hypothesis that the naturally occurring cell death in the l.m.c. is due to the failure of their axons to survive in a competion process at the periphery. Observations of the time pattern of muscle differentiation and their neurotization in the leg further endorse this hypothesis. However, it is not clear whether the axons compete for contact sites on muscle fibers or for a “trophic” agent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sections
Abercrombie, M. (1946) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1090940210 · Cited by 4,363
Cited by
Synaptic density in human frontal cortex —Developmental changes and effects of aging
Peter R., H. (1979) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(79)90349-4 · Cited by 2,645
Developmental cell death: morphological diversity and multiple mechanisms
Clarke, P. H. (1990) · Anatomy and Embryology · doi:10.1007/bf00174615 · Cited by 1,695
Changeux, J.-P., & Danchin, A. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/264705a0 · Cited by 1,448
Regressive Events in Neurogenesis
Cowan, W. M., Fawcett, J. W., O'Leary, D. D. M., & Stanfield, B. B. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6474175 · Cited by 1,316
Chiel, H. J., & Beer, R. D. (1997) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01149-1 · Cited by 864
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamburger, V.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-04-15
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 535-546
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2085981744
- Cited by
- 660
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell death in the development of the lateral motor column of the chick embryo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901600408
- The paper
- Hamburger, V. (1975). Cell death in the development of the lateral motor column of the chick embryo. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901600408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.