Direct and indirect preoculomotor pathways of the brainstem: An autoradiographic study of the pontine reticular formation in the cat

Abstract

The efferent connections of the paramedian pontine reticular formation have been studied in the cat in autoradiographic experiments designed to analyze direct and indirect preoculomotor pathways. Injections of tritium‐labelled amino acids were placed (1) near the border between the oral and caudal subdivisions of the nucleus pontis centralis, (2) in more rostral and dorsal parts of the pontine tegmentum, (3) at the pontomesencephalic border, and (4) at the pontomedullary border. Tegmental injections of the first group were unique in labelling a direct ipsilateral pathway to the abducens nucleus and nucleus prepositus hypoglossi. More rostral injections failed to produce discrete labelling of the nuclei of the extraocular muscles but labelled nearby tegmentum and central gray substance. Caudal deposits, involving the pontomedullary reticular formation at its junction with the abducens, perihypoglossal and vestibular nuclei, labelled a decussating fiber system reaching the contralateral abducens nucleus, nucleus prepositus hypoglossi and parts of the vestibular complex. In a single additional case, an injection placed in the oculomotor complex produced heavy labelling of the abducens nuclei. All tegmental injections labelled discrete reticulo‐reticular and other variably complex longitudinal pathways. Most injections of (a) the pontomedullary and (b) the pontomesencephalic zones elicited labelling of the pretectum including the nucleus of the optic tract. An incidental finding in the latter group was dense labelling of the pars compacta of the substantia nigra, subthalamic nucleus, and (1 case) entopeduncular nucleus; in one case of each of these groups, labelled fibers were traced to the external pallidum. These observations suggest that, with respect to its efferent oculomotor affiliations, the paramedian pontine tegmentum may be divided into compartments whose supranuclear connections are distinct but for the most part heavily weighted toward influencing the abducens nucleus and periabducens region. Considered within the framework of behavioral and physiological studies of the so‐called pontine gaze center, and studies of pontine afferents, the findings are interpreted as suggesting a functional differentiation of these tegmental zones with respect to their influence on eye‐head coordination.