Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 643

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three bulbospinal pathways from the rostral medulla of the cat: An autoradiographic study of pain modulating systems

Basbaum, Allan I., Clanton, Charles H., Fields, Howard L.·1978·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Small amounts of 3 H‐leucine were injected into discrete regions in the rostral medulla of the cat. Descending projections from these sites were studied with autoradiographic methods. On the basis of differential projections to the medulla and spinal cord, three distinct regions were delineated. Nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis (Rgc), located dorsally in the medullary reticular formation, projects primarily to “motor” related sites, including cranial motor nuclei VI, VII, XII, nucleus intercalatus, and a part of the ipsilateral medial accessory olive. The projection to the spinal cord is primarily via the ipsilateral ventrolateral and contralateral ventral funiculi. The Rgc terminal field is in lamina VII and VIII ipsilateral and lamina VIII contralateral to the injection site. In contrast, nucleus raphe magnus, (NRM) located ventrally, in the midline of the rostral medulla projects primarily to structures with known nociceptive and/or visceral afferent input. These sites include the solitary nucleus, the dorsal motor nucleus (X) and the marginal and gelatinous layers of the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis. The projection to the spinal cord is bilateral, via the dorsolateral funiculus. Terminal fields are found in the marginal zone and the substantia gelatinosa of the dorsal horn, and more deeply in lamina V, medial VI and VII. Nucleus reticularis magnocellularis (Rmc), located lateral to NRM and ventral to Rgc, has an overlapping projection with NRM, but the projection is ipsilateral. This difference between Rmc and Rgc is correlated with cytoarchitectural features of the two regions. The possibility that the raphe‐spinal pathway in the DLF mediates opiate and brain stimulation‐produced analgesia is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901780203

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 643

Metadata

Authors
Basbaum, A. I., Clanton, C. H., & Fields, H. L.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-03-15
Volume
178
Issue
2
Pages
209-224
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W1974164498
Cited by
643
References
1
FWCI
44.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three bulbospinal pathways from the rostral medulla of the cat: An autoradiographic study of pain modulating systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901780203
The paper
Basbaum, A. I., Clanton, C. H., & Fields, H. L. (1978). Three bulbospinal pathways from the rostral medulla of the cat: An autoradiographic study of pain modulating systems. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901780203

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.