The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electron microscopic analysis of postnatal histogenesis in the cerebellar cortex of staggerer mutant mice
Abstract
Postnatal development of the cerebellar cortex has been compared in staggerer mutant and unaffected littermate mice. From postnatal day 3 to about day 21 the external granular layer in staggerer mice is decreased in thickness and area, and the number of postmitotic granule cell neurons is reduced. Those granule cells that are generated seem to differentiate normally, with the remarkable exception that they from only primitive junctions with Purkinje cell dendritic shafts. These specialized junctions are not superseded by the normal parallel fiber: Purkinje spine synapses and disappear by the third week. Purkinje cell somata and dendrites are smaller than normal at all stages examined. The dendrites are not confined to the sagittal plane as in the normal and, unique among mutant or other animals described to date, they exhibit virtually no branchlet spines. All other cortical synaptic relations of granule and Purkinje cells, including climbing fiber: Purkinje spine synapses, appear qualitatively normal. However, by 28 days virtually all staggerer granule cells have degenerated. While the primary genetic defect remains unknown, we postulate that the morphological abnormalities may be attributable to a block in the normal developmental relationship between granule cells and Purkinje cells. The small cell size and failure to form branchlet spines suggest that the Purkinje cell abnormality may be closer to the primary effect of the mutant gene than the more flagrant hypoplasia and degeneration of granule cell neurons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Altman, J. (1972) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901450402 · Cited by 996
Characteristics of Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses in the Central Nervous System of the Cat
UCHIZONO, K. (1965) · Nature · doi:10.1038/207642a0 · Cited by 917
Cited by
Jetten, A. M. (2009) · Nuclear Receptor Signaling · doi:10.1621/nrs.07003 · Cited by 673
Wood, K. A., Dipasquale, B., & Youle, R. J. (1993) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(93)90074-2 · Cited by 340
Villalba, M., Bockaert, J., & Journot, L. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-01-00083.1997 · Cited by 306
Cell cycle regulation of neuronal apoptosis in development and disease
Becker, E. B. E., & Bonni, A. (2004) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2003.12.005 · Cited by 302
Yan, G.-M., Ni, B., Weller, M., Wood, K. A., & Paul, S. M. (1994) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(94)91364-1 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Landis, D. M. D., & Sidman, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1978-06-15
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 831-863
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2093825399
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron microscopic analysis of postnatal histogenesis in the cerebellar cortex of staggerer mutant mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901790408
- The paper
- Landis, D. M. D., & Sidman, R. L. (1978). Electron microscopic analysis of postnatal histogenesis in the cerebellar cortex of staggerer mutant mice. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901790408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.