The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Projections of a telencephalic auditory nucleus– field L–in the canary
Abstract
Anterograde projections of a telencephalic auditory area – field L of the neostriatum – were traced in canaries, Serinus canarius. Field L was defined as the neostriatal projection of nucleus ovoidalis of the thalamus. Using amino acid autoradiography, two efferent projections of field L and adjacent neostriatum were observed: (1) a projection to the medial and ventral borders of nucleus hyperstriatum ventrale, pars caudale (HVc) and (2) a smaller projection to medial paleostriatum augmentatu (PA). When autoradiographic injection sites included neostriatum postero‐ventral to field L, a projection to archistriatum outlining the anterior and ventral borders of the nucleus robustus archistriatalis (RA) resulted. Injection sites that included neostriatum antero‐lateral to “L” gave rise to projections to the interior of HVc proper. Above background numbers of silver grains were consistently observed over caudal dorso‐lateral portions of nucleus ovoidalis. Following lesion of field L and adjacent neostriatum, argyrophilic degeneration was traced to medial PA and to a shelf of neostriatum underlying HVc. All observed anterograde projections were ipsilateral. Two of the nuclei outlined by neostriatal projections in this study, HVc and RA, have important roles in the motor control of canary song (Nottebohm et al., '76). The development of song is dependent on auditory information. Auditory‐vocal neural connections described here may be involved in song learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms
Doupe, A. J., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567 · Cited by 1,633
Revised nomenclature for avian telencephalon and some related brainstem nuclei
Reiner, A., Perkel, D. J., Bruce, L. L., Butler, A. B., Csillag, A., Kuenzel, W., Medina, L., Paxinos, G., Shimizu, T., Striedter, G., et al. (2004) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20118 · Cited by 1,148
Forebrain Lesions Disrupt Development But Not Maintenance of Song in Passerine Birds
Bottjer, S. W., Miesner, E. A., & Arnold, A. P. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6719123 · Cited by 827
Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain.
Mello, C. V., Vicario, D. S., & Clayton, D. F. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.15.6818 · Cited by 615
Connections of vocal control nuclei in the canary telencephalon
Nottebohm, F., Paton, J. A., & Kelley, D. B. (1982) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902070406 · Cited by 526
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelley, D. B., & Nottebohm, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-02
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 455-469
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2131116204
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Projections of a telencephalic auditory nucleus– field L–in the canary. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901830302
- The paper
- Kelley, D. B., & Nottebohm, F. (1979). Projections of a telencephalic auditory nucleus– field L–in the canary. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901830302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.