The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proliferative and migratory activity of glial cells in the partially deafferented hippocampus
Abstract
The proliferative response of the glial cell population of the adult rat hippocampus deafferented by unilateral lesion of the entorhinal cortex was studied using 3 H‐thymidine autoradiography. Two experimental paradigms were used, involving: (1) intraventricular 3 H‐thymidine injection at a number of post‐lesion intervals with sacrifice six hours later and (2) intraventricular injection at 30 hours post‐lesion with sacrifice at 6, 96, or 192 hours later. The first increase in the number of labeled glial cells was obtained at 20 hours post‐lesion and was confined to areas of degenerating axons. By 30 hours a large and uniformly dense proliferative response was observed throughout the ipsilateral, and medial aspects of the contralateral, hippocampus encompassing both deafferented and intact regions. Cell division continued through 50 and 65 hours post‐lesion particularly in directly deafferented regions, but diminished to control levels by 80 hours. Although oligodendroglia and astrocyte‐like cells were sometimes found to have incorporated the label the most common proliferative element within the hippocampus corresponded to previous light microscopic descriptions of “microglial” cells. The experiments using thymidine injection given at the peak proliferative period followed by survival periods of varying lengths indicated that a progressive redistribution of labeled nuclei occurred resulting in an accumulation of labeled cells in the zones of deafferentation. Multiple division of cells within these areas as well as the migration of nuclei from non‐deafferented regions was found to contribute to this effect. The possible involvement of glial proliferation with other morphological effects of deafferentation, including the sprouting response of intact afferents, is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evidence that granule cells generated in the dentate gyrus of adult rats extend axonal projections
Stanfield, B. B., & Trice, J. E. (1988) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00250261 · Cited by 431
Microglial cell population dynamics in the injured adult central nervous system
Ladeby, R., Wirenfeldt, M., Garcia-Ovejero, D., Fenger, C., Dissing-Olesen, L., Dalmau, I., & Finsen, B. (2005) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.12.009 · Cited by 334
Poirier, J., Baccichet, A., Dea, D., & Gauthier, S. (1993) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/0306-4522(93)90456-p · Cited by 329
CXCR3-Dependent Microglial Recruitment Is Essential for Dendrite Loss after Brain Lesion
Rappert, A., Bechmann, I., Pivneva, T., Mahlo, J., Biber, K., Nolte, C., Kovac, A. D., Gerard, C., Boddeke, H. W. G. M., Nitsch, R., et al. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2451-04.2004 · Cited by 259
Degeneration of hippocampal CA3 pyramidal cells induced by intraventricular kainic acid
Nadler, J. V., Perry, B. W., Gentry, C., & Cotman, C. W. (1980) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901920209 · Cited by 255
Metadata
- Authors
- Gall, C., Rose, G., & Lynch, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-02
- Volume
- 183
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 539-549
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W1999075359
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proliferative and migratory activity of glial cells in the partially deafferented hippocampus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901830306
- The paper
- Gall, C., Rose, G., & Lynch, G. (1979). Proliferative and migratory activity of glial cells in the partially deafferented hippocampus. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901830306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.