Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Distribution and light microscopic features of granule cells in the cochlear nuclei of cat, rat, and mouse

Mugnaini, Enrico, Warr, W. Bruce, Osen, Kirsten Kjelsberg·1980·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

In the present study the cytology and the topography of the cochlear granule cell domain (a comprehensive term introduced here for all granule cell‐containing regions of the cochlear nuclear complex) have been studied light microscopically in Nissl, Bielschowsky, and Golgi‐Del Rio‐Hortega material of cats, rats, and mice; in Golgi rapid material of 0–14‐day‐old kittens; and in sections of 6‐week‐old kittens following HRP injections in the superficial dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). The domain has been parcellated in seven subdivisions which, in spite of some species' differences, are easily identifiable in all of the included animals. The cochlear granule cells are considered as a particular class of neuron, which is slightly different from, but nevertheless principally similar to the cerebellar granule cells in both shape and mode of neuronal connections. The digitiform terminals of the cochlear granule cells differentiate after the first two weeks of extrauterine life. In several respects these cells show larger variation among species than do the cerebellar granules, the similarity between the two classes of granule cells being most conspicuous in the rodent. The silver, Golgi rapid, and HRP material suggest that all, or at least the majority, of the granule cell axons project to the molecular layer of the DCN, forming parallel fibers similar to those of the cerebellar cortex. Also, the cochlear parallel fibers traverse the spiny apical dendrites of principal neurons (the pyramidal cells) and the smoother dendrites of molecular layer stellate cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901910406

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 339

Metadata

Authors
Mugnaini, E., Warr, W. B., & Osen, K. K.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-06-15
Volume
191
Issue
4
Pages
581-606
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2026579849
Cited by
339
References
0
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution and light microscopic features of granule cells in the cochlear nuclei of cat, rat, and mouse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901910406
The paper
Mugnaini, E., Warr, W. B., & Osen, K. K. (1980). Distribution and light microscopic features of granule cells in the cochlear nuclei of cat, rat, and mouse. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901910406

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.