The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distribution and light microscopic features of granule cells in the cochlear nuclei of cat, rat, and mouse
Abstract
In the present study the cytology and the topography of the cochlear granule cell domain (a comprehensive term introduced here for all granule cell‐containing regions of the cochlear nuclear complex) have been studied light microscopically in Nissl, Bielschowsky, and Golgi‐Del Rio‐Hortega material of cats, rats, and mice; in Golgi rapid material of 0–14‐day‐old kittens; and in sections of 6‐week‐old kittens following HRP injections in the superficial dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). The domain has been parcellated in seven subdivisions which, in spite of some species' differences, are easily identifiable in all of the included animals. The cochlear granule cells are considered as a particular class of neuron, which is slightly different from, but nevertheless principally similar to the cerebellar granule cells in both shape and mode of neuronal connections. The digitiform terminals of the cochlear granule cells differentiate after the first two weeks of extrauterine life. In several respects these cells show larger variation among species than do the cerebellar granules, the similarity between the two classes of granule cells being most conspicuous in the rodent. The silver, Golgi rapid, and HRP material suggest that all, or at least the majority, of the granule cell axons project to the molecular layer of the DCN, forming parallel fibers similar to those of the cerebellar cortex. Also, the cochlear parallel fibers traverse the spiny apical dendrites of principal neurons (the pyramidal cells) and the smoother dendrites of molecular layer stellate cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The dual origins of the olivocochlear bundle in the albino rat
White, J. S., & Warr, B. W. (1983) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902190206 · Cited by 300
Luján, R., Shigemoto, R., Kulik, A., & Juiz, J. M. (2004) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.20160 · Cited by 51
Adaptive processing in electrosensory systems: Links to cerebellar plasticity and learning
Sawtell, N. B., & Bell, C. C. (2008) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.10.009 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Mugnaini, E., Warr, W. B., & Osen, K. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1980-06-15
- Volume
- 191
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 581-606
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2026579849
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution and light microscopic features of granule cells in the cochlear nuclei of cat, rat, and mouse. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901910406
- The paper
- Mugnaini, E., Warr, W. B., & Osen, K. K. (1980). Distribution and light microscopic features of granule cells in the cochlear nuclei of cat, rat, and mouse. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901910406
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.