Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Representation pattern in the second somatic sensory area of the monkey cerebral cortex

Friedman, D. P., Jones, E. G., Burton, H.·1980·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The body representation in the second somatic sensory area of macaques has been studied by tracing with anatomical techniques the projections from defined parts of the body representation in the first somatic sensory area (SI) to their terminal regions within the lateral sulcus. The second somatic sensory area (SII), as identified in terms of cytoarchitecture and its connection with the thalamic ventrobasal complex, is the only region of the lateral sulcus to receive a projection from SI. The nearby retroinsular area and area 7b receive a projection from area 5. Within SII the face and head representations lie anteriorly, occupying the dorsalmost part of the insula and portions of the fronto‐parietal operculum. The digits, hand, and arm are represented posterior to the face and may take up the mediolateral extent of the parietal operculum in the region immediately in front of the posterior pole of the insula. The trunk representation is lateral to the arm representation, i.e., deep within the superior circular sulcus and on the dorsal insula. The hindlimb appears behind the trunk also occupying the superior circular sulcus in addition to the deepest 2–3 mm of the upper bank of lateral sulcus immediately posterior to the insula. Areas 3b, 1, and 2 each project to SII, and their projections appear to converge within the representation of a given body part. Injections of anterogradely transported tracers in SI label vertically oriented columnar arrays of terminal ramifications in SII, resembling those previously described for other cortico‐cortical projections within the sensory‐motor region. In experiments which combined anterograde and retrograde labeling, cells projecting from SII to SI formed columns exactly coinciding with the columns of anterogradely labeled axons terminating in SII. The cells of origin of cortico‐cortical projections emanating from SII formed two distinct laminar populations, one in the supragranular layers and the second mainly in layer VI. There is evidence for fiber terminations within layer VI mainly underlying the column formed by the terminal ramifications in layers I through IV.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.901920103

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Friedman, D. P., Jones, E. G., & Burton, H.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-07
Volume
192
Issue
1
Pages
21-41
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2042619570
Cited by
280
References
2
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Representation pattern in the second somatic sensory area of the monkey cerebral cortex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.901920103
The paper
Friedman, D. P., Jones, E. G., & Burton, H. (1980). Representation pattern in the second somatic sensory area of the monkey cerebral cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901920103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.