The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Somatosensory properties of the inferior olive of the cat
Abstract
We examined the somatosensory properties of 391 neurons in the inferior olive in 20 cats that were anesthetized with barbiturate or decere‐brated. A response consisted of a single spike with a variable number of wavelets followed by a long refractory period. Neurons responsive to natural somatosensory stimuli were recorded in all olivary subdivisions. The dorsal accessory olive (DAO) contained the highest proportion of responsive units (96%), compared with 66% for the medial accessory olive (MAO) and 43% for the principal olivary (PO) nucleus. Within the rostral DAO we found a refined cutaneous map of the entire contralateral body surface. In the caudal DAO responsiveness to manipulation of deep tissues became prominent, and both individual limbs and bilateral pairs were represented. In the medial region of the PO responsiveness to taps predominated and bilaterally symmetrical fields were frequent. The lateral PO was unresponsive under the conditions of these experiments. The MAO was distinguished by a greater complexity of receptive field and by a preponderance of deep over cutaneous modality. The lateral part of caudal MAO contained cells with interesting spatial patterns of excitation and inhibition, whereas most cells in the rostral MAO had purely excitatory fields. A teleceptive area receiving visual and auditory input was recognized in the medial MAO and nearby structures such as the dorsal cap. Contact and proprioceptive signals arriving via climbing fibers may provide the cerebellum with information necessary to relate the body to external objects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marr, D. (1969) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008820 · Cited by 3,253
Cited by
Yeo, C. H., Hardiman, M. J., & Glickstein, M. (1985) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00237022 · Cited by 537
Microcircuitry and function of the inferior olive
De Zeeuw, C. I., Hoogenraad, C. C., Koekkoek, S. K. E., Ruigrok, T. J. H., Galjart, N., & Simpson, J. I. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01310-1 · Cited by 466
Classical conditioning using stimulation of the inferior olive as the unconditioned stimulus.
Mauk, M. D., Steinmetz, J. E., & Thompson, R. F. (1986) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.83.14.5349 · Cited by 353
The detection and generation of sequences as a key to cerebellar function: Experiments and theory
Braitenberg, V., Heck, D., & Sultan, F. (1997) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x9700143x · Cited by 298
Neural mechanisms of classical conditioning in mammals
Thompson, R. F. (1990) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1990.0161 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Gellman, R., Houk, J. C., & Gibson, A. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-04
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 228-243
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2109354534
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Somatosensory properties of the inferior olive of the cat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902150210
- The paper
- Gellman, R., Houk, J. C., & Gibson, A. R. (1983). Somatosensory properties of the inferior olive of the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902150210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.